Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29339511›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2018

The role of obesity in exceptionally slow US mortality improvement.

Samuel H Preston, Yana C Vierboom, Andrew Stokes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 90 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
90citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

90 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Subtypes of Hypertension 2 to 7 Years After First Pregnancy.Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979) · 2026
    Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational

30 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Samuel H PrestonDepartment of Sociology and Population Studies Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104; spreston@upenn.edu acstokes@bu.edu.
Yana C VierboomDepartment of Sociology and Population Studies Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104.
Andrew StokesDepartment of Global Health, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02118 spreston@upenn.edu acstokes@bu.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-8502-3636

Funding

GRADUATE TRAINING IN DEMOGRAPHYT32HD007242 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI MICHEL GUILLOT · 1985 to 2026
$6.6M
The Contribution of Obesity to International Differences in LongevityR01AG040212 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI PRESTON, SAMUEL H · 2011 to 2015
$1.7M
Using lifetime maximum weight to measure prevalence, trends, and mortality risks of obesity in the NHANESR03SH000037 · SH · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI STOKES, ANDREW · 2016 to 2016
$58k
NCHS CDC HHS R03 SH000037NIA NIH HHS R01 AG040212NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD007242
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent studies have described a reduction in the rate of improvement in American mortality. The pace of improvement is also slow by international standards. This paper attempts to identify the extent to which rising body mass index (BMI) is responsible for reductions in the rate of mortality improvement in the United States. The data for this study were obtained from subsequent cohorts of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III, 1988-1994; NHANES continuous, 1999-2010) and from the NHANES linked mortality files, which include follow-up into death records through December 2011. The role of BMI was estimated using Cox models comparing mortality trends in the presence and absence of adjustment for maximum lifetime BMI (Max BMI). Introducing Max BMI into a Cox model controlling for age and sex raised the annual rate of mortality decline by 0.54% (95% confidence interval 0.45-0.64%). Results were robust to the inclusion of other variables in the model, to differences in how Max BMI was measured, and to how trends were evaluated. The effect of rising Max BMI is large relative to international mortality trends and to alternative mortality futures simulated by the Social Security Administration. The increase in Max BMI over the period 1988-2011 is estimated to have reduced life expectancy at age 40 by 0.9 years in 2011 (95% confidence interval 0.7-1.1 years) and accounted for 186,000 excess deaths that year. Rising levels of BMI have prevented the United States from enjoying the full benefits of factors working to improve mortality.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBody Mass IndexFemaleHumansLife ExpectancyMaleMiddle AgedMortalityNutrition SurveysObesityPrevalenceUnited Stateslife expectancymortalityobesitypopulation health

Identifiers

PMID29339511
PMCPMC5798364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.