Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29339012›Full record

ArticleWomen's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health

Patient-Rated Access to Needed Care: Patient-Centered Medical Home Principles Intertwined.

Julian Brunner, Emmeline Chuang, Donna L Washington, Danielle E Rose, Catherine Chanfreau-Coffinier, Jill E Darling, Ismelda A Canelo, Elizabeth M Yano

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Women's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02039856 (Implementation of VA Womens Health Patient Aligned Care Teams WH-PACTs), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02039856 nacompletednot on this map

Implementation of VA Womens Health Patient Aligned Care Teams WH-PACTs

TypeinterventionalSponsorVA Office of Research and DevelopmentRan2014 to 2018Enrolled3,900ConditionsPatient-centered Medical Home ImplementationArmsMultilevel stakeholder engagement, Quality improvement (QI) education/training, Technical support, Formative feedback, External practice facilitation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Julian BrunnerHSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation, and Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Health Care System, Sepulveda, California; Department of Health Policy and Management, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California. Electronic address: julian.brunner@va.gov.
Emmeline ChuangDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
Donna L WashingtonHSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation, and Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Health Care System, Sepulveda, California; Department of Medicine, Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
Danielle E RoseHSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation, and Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Health Care System, Sepulveda, California.
Catherine Chanfreau-CoffinierHSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation, and Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Health Care System, Sepulveda, California.
Jill E DarlingDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California; USC Center for Economic and Social Research, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.
Ismelda A CaneloHSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation, and Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Health Care System, Sepulveda, California.
Elizabeth M YanoHSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation, and Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Health Care System, Sepulveda, California; Department of Health Policy and Management, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.

Funding

NRSA Training CoreTL1TR001883 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI ALEX BUI, Nina Thawata Harawa · 2016 to 2026
$8.6M
UCLA Clinical and Translational Science InstituteTL1TR000121 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI DUBINETT, STEVEN M. · 2012 to 2015
$2.7M
Implementation of VA Womens Health Patient Aligned Care Teams WH-PACTsI01HX000991 · VA · VA GREATER LOS ANGELES HEALTHCARE SYSTEM · PI YANO, ELIZABETH M · 2013 to 2016
–
HSRD VA I01 HX000991NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR000121NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR001883
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrimary care teams can facilitate access to care by helping patients to determine whether and when care is needed, and coordinating care across multiple clinicians and settings. Appointment availability metrics may or may not capture these contributions, but patients' own ratings of their access to care provide an important alternative view of access that may be more closely related to these key functions of care teams. PROCEDURES: We used a 2015 telephone survey of 1,395 women veterans to examine associations between key care team functions and patient-rated access to needed care. The care team functions were care coordination, in-person communication (between patient and care team), and phone communication (timely answers to health questions). We controlled for sociodemographics, health status, care settings, and other experience of care measures. KEY

findingsOverall, 74% of participants reported always or usually being able to see a provider for routine care, and 68% for urgent care. In adjusted analyses, phone communication was associated with better ratings of access to routine care (odds ratio [OR], 4.31; 95% CI, 2.65-6.98) and urgent care (OR, 2.26; 95% CI, 1.23-4.18). Care coordination was also associated with better ratings of access to routine care (OR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.01-2.74) and urgent care (OR, 2.26; 95% CI, 1.23-4.18). Associations with in-person communication were not significant.

conclusionsAccess, communication, and care coordination are interrelated. Approaches to improving access may prove counterproductive if they compromise the team's ability to coordinate care, or diminish the team's role as a primary point of contact for patients.

Indexed as

Appointments and SchedulesVeteransAdultCommunicationCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHospitalsHumansInterviews as TopicMiddle AgedPatient-Centered CarePrimary Health Care

Identifiers

PMID29339012
PMCPMC6785240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.