Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29338786›Full record

SynthesisMalaria journal2018

A systematic review of transfusion-transmitted malaria in non-endemic areas.

Federica Verra, Andrea Angheben, Elisa Martello, Giovanni Giorli, Francesca Perandin, Zeno Bisoffi

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Malaria journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
12.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 102 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Transfusion-transmittedThe Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Moleculargenetic and in Addition Partly Discrepant Infection Serological Malaria Testing in Two Blood Donors.Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Federica VerraCentre for Tropical Diseases, Sacro Cuore-Don Calabria Hospital, 37024, Negrar, Verona, Italy. fverra66@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5649-2361
Andrea AnghebenCentre for Tropical Diseases, Sacro Cuore-Don Calabria Hospital, 37024, Negrar, Verona, Italy.
Elisa MartelloDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Turin, Grugliasco, 10095, Turin, Italy.
Giovanni GiorliCentre for Tropical Diseases, Sacro Cuore-Don Calabria Hospital, 37024, Negrar, Verona, Italy.
Francesca PerandinCentre for Tropical Diseases, Sacro Cuore-Don Calabria Hospital, 37024, Negrar, Verona, Italy.
Zeno BisoffiCentre for Tropical Diseases, Sacro Cuore-Don Calabria Hospital, 37024, Negrar, Verona, Italy.
Ospedale Sacro Cuore Don Calabria · ITUniversity of Turin · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTransfusion-transmitted malaria (TTM) is an accidental Plasmodium infection caused by whole blood or a blood component transfusion from a malaria infected donor to a recipient. Infected blood transfusions directly release malaria parasites in the recipient's bloodstream triggering the development of high risk complications, and potentially leading to a fatal outcome especially in individuals with no previous exposure to malaria or in immuno-compromised patients. A systematic review was conducted on TTM case reports in non-endemic areas to describe the epidemiological characteristics of blood donors and recipients.

methodsRelevant articles were retrieved from Pubmed, EMBASE, Scopus, and LILACS. From each selected study the following data were extracted: study area, gender and age of blood donor and recipient, blood component associated with TTM, Plasmodium species, malaria diagnostic method employed, blood donor screening method, incubation period between the infected transfusion and the onset of clinical symptoms in the recipient, time elapsed between the clinical symptoms and the diagnosis of malaria, infection outcome, country of origin of the blood donor and time of the last potential malaria exposure.

resultsPlasmodium species were detected in 100 TTM case reports with a different frequency: 45% Plasmodium falciparum, 30% Plasmodium malariae, 16% Plasmodium vivax, 4% Plasmodium ovale, 2% Plasmodium knowlesi, 1% mixed infection P. falciparum/P. malariae. The majority of fatal outcomes (11/45) was caused by P. falciparum whilst the other fatalities occurred in individuals infected by P. malariae (2/30) and P. ovale (1/4). However, non P. falciparum fatalities were not attributed directly to malaria. The incubation time for all Plasmodium species TTM case reports was longer than what expected in natural infections. This difference was statistically significant for P. malariae (p = 0.006). A longer incubation time in the recipient together with a chronic infection at low parasite density of the donor makes P. malariae a subtle but not negligible risk for blood safety aside from P. falciparum.

conclusionsTTM risk needs to be taken into account in order to enhance the safety of the blood supply chain from donors to recipients by means of appropriate diagnostic tools.

Indexed as

Transfusion ReactionBlood TransfusionHumansMalariaPlasmodiumBlood component transfusionBlood transfusionMalariaPlasmodiumTransfusion-transmitted malaria (TTM)

Identifiers

PMID29338786
PMCPMC5771189
OpenAlexW2784009335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.