Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29338734›Full record

SynthesisWorld journal of surgical oncology2018

Comparing the benefits of chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy for resectable stage III A/N2 non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis.

Yuqiao Chen, Xiong Peng, Yuan Zhou, Kun Xia, Wei Zhuang

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in World journal of surgical oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The optimal immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with chemotherapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Pathological response to neoadjuvant therapy with chemotherapyWorld journal of clinical oncology · 2021
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Advances in multimodal treatment for stage IIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer.Journal of clinical and translational research · 2021
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Multidisciplinary consensus statement on the clinical management of patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yuqiao ChenDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, 410008, Changsha, Hunan, People's Republic of China.
Xiong PengDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, 410008, Changsha, Hunan, People's Republic of China.
Yuan ZhouDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, 410008, Changsha, Hunan, People's Republic of China.
Kun XiaDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, 410008, Changsha, Hunan, People's Republic of China.
Wei ZhuangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, 410008, Changsha, Hunan, People's Republic of China. zhuangwei@csu.edu.cn.
Xiangya Hospital Central South University · CNCentral South University · CN

Funding

Hunan Provincial Science and Technology Department (CN) 2017JJ2345
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInduction chemotherapy has been shown to improve survival of patients with stage III A/N2 (T1-3, N2, M0) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), followed by resection, but the benefits of neoadjuvant radiotherapy still remain controversial.

methodsPubMed, Embase, and Cochrane library databases were searched for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the outcomes of induction chemoradiotherapy over induction chemotherapy, in patients with resectable stage IIIA/N2 NSCLC. Odds ratios (ORs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated using random- or fixed-effects model, and heterogeneity was assessed using I

resultsA total of three RCTs met the inclusion criteria of our meta-analysis. The pooled results demonstrated that, in comparison to induction chemotherapy, induction chemoradiotherapy has a significant benefit in tumor response, mediastinal downstaging, and pathological complete response of mediastinal lymph nodes. In addition, no more peri-intervention mortality was detected in patients from chemoradiotherapy group, and a higher number of patients from this group had R0 resection. However, our results did not show any difference between overall survival and progression-free survival after 2, 4, and 6 years of follow-ups, in patients undergoing radiation therapy vs. induction chemotherapy.

conclusionPreoperative chemoradiotherapy, as compared to induction chemotherapy alone, is associated with similar peri-intervention mortality, a greater tumor response, mediastinal nodule downstaging, and rate of R0 resection, but does not improve survival of resectable stage IIIA/N2 NSCLC patients.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungChemoradiotherapyHumansInduction ChemotherapyLung NeoplasmsNeoadjuvant TherapySurvival RateTreatment OutcomeAntineoplastic AgentsInduction therapyMeta-analysisNeoadjuvant chemoradiotherapyNon-small cell lung cancer

Identifiers

PMID29338734
PMCPMC5771204
OpenAlexW2783689974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.