Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29338723›Full record

Trial reportBMC public health2018

Preventing suicidal behaviours with a multilevel intervention: a cluster randomised controlled trial.

Sunny Collings, Gabrielle Jenkin, James Stanley, Sarah McKenzie, Simon Hatcher

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Effectiveness of a communal, multilevel, interdisciplinary suicide prevention program.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sunny CollingsSuicide and Mental Health Research Group, University of Otago, PO Box 7343, Mein St, Newtown, Wellington, New Zealand. Sunny.Collings@otago.ac.nz.
Gabrielle JenkinSuicide and Mental Health Research Group, University of Otago, PO Box 7343, Mein St, Newtown, Wellington, New Zealand.
James StanleyUniversity of Otago, PO Box 7343, Mein St, Newtown, Wellington, New Zealand.
Sarah McKenzieSuicide and Mental Health Research Group, University of Otago, PO Box 7343, Mein St, Newtown, Wellington, New Zealand.
Simon HatcherDepartment of Psychiatry and Brain and Mind Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.

Funding

Ministry of Health, New Zealand N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the context of the recent surge in community based multilevel interventions for suicide prevention, all of which show promising results, we discuss the implications of the findings of such an intervention designed for and implemented in New Zealand. The multi-level intervention for suicide prevention in New Zealand (MISP-NZ) was a cluster randomised controlled community intervention trial involving eight hospital regions matched into four pairs and randomised to either the intervention or practice as usual (the control). Intervention regions received 25 months of interventions (01 June 2010 to 30 June 2012) including: 1) training in recognition of suicide risk factors; 2) workshops on mental health issues; 3) community based interventions (linking in with community events); and 4) distribution of print material and information on web-based resources.

resultsThere was no significant difference between the change in rate of suicidal behaviours (ISH or self-inflicted deaths) in the intervention group compared with the control group (rate ratio = 1.07, 95% CI 0.82, 1.38).

conclusionsThis study did not provide substantive evidence that the MISP-NZ intervention had an effect on suicidal behaviours raising important questions about the potential effectiveness of the multilevel intervention model for suicide prevention for all countries. Although a range of factors may account for this unanticipated finding, including inadequate study power, differences in design and intervention focus, and country-specific contextual factors, it is possible that the effectiveness of the multilevel intervention model for reducing suicidal behaviours may have been overstated.

trial registrationThis trial was retrospectively registered on 11 April 2013. ACTRN12613000399796 .

Indexed as

Suicidal IdeationSuicide PreventionCluster AnalysisHumansMultilevel AnalysisNew ZealandRisk FactorsSuicide

Identifiers

PMID29338723
PMCPMC5771156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.