Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29338719›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2018

Preventing malaria in the Peruvian Amazon: a qualitative study in Iquitos, Peru.

Ian Newell, Connie Wiskin, James Anthoney, Graciela Meza, Gilles de Wildt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Antibody Responses AgainstFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ian NewellCollege of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK. Ixn343@student.bham.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4784-0643
Connie WiskinInstitute of Clinical Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
James AnthoneyCollege of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Graciela MezaFacultad de Medicina Humana, Universidad Nacional de la Amazonia Peruana, Iquitos, Peru.
Gilles de WildtCollege of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.

Funding

University of Birmingham TF-BRGM-PP-0817
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn Peru, despite decades of concerted control efforts, malaria remains a significant public health burden. Peru has recently exhibited a dramatic rise in malaria incidence, impeding South America's progress towards malaria elimination. The Amazon basin, in particular the Loreto region of Peru, has been identified as a target for the implementation of intensified control strategies, aiming for elimination. No research has addressed why vector control strategies in Loreto have had limited impact in the past, despite vector control elsewhere being highly effective in reducing malaria transmission. This study employed qualitative methods to explore factors limiting the success of vector control strategies in the region.

methodsTwenty semi-structured interviews were conducted among adults attending a primary care centre in Iquitos, Peru, together with 3 interviews with key informants (health care professionals). The interviews focussed on how local knowledge, together with social and cultural attitudes, determined the use of vector control methods.

resultsFive themes emerged. (a) Participants believed malaria to be embedded within their culture, and commonly blamed this for a lack of regard for prevention. (b) They perceived a shift in mosquito biting times to early evening, rendering night-time use of bed nets less effective. (c) Poor preventive practices were compounded by a consensus that malaria prevention was the government's responsibility, and that this reduced motivation for personal prevention. (d) Participants confused the purpose of space-spraying. (e) Participants' responses also exposed persisting misconceptions, mainly concerning the cause of malaria and best practices for its prevention.

conclusionTo eliminate malaria from the Americas, region-specific strategies need to be developed that take into account the local social and cultural contexts. In Loreto, further research is needed to explore the potential shift in biting behaviour of Anopheles darlingi, and how this interacts with the population's social behaviours and current use of preventive measures. Attitudes concerning personal responsibility for malaria prevention and long-standing misconceptions as to the cause of malaria and best preventive practices also need to be addressed.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePerceptionAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnimalsAnophelesFemaleHumansInsect Bites and StingsMalariaMaleMiddle AgedMosquito VectorsPeruPrimary PreventionBed netsIndoor residual sprayingMalariaPeruPreventionQualitativeSpace spraying

Identifiers

PMID29338719
PMCPMC5771103

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.