Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29338718›Full record

ArticleBMC biology2018

A live cell assay of GPCR coupling allows identification of optogenetic tools for controlling Go and Gi signaling.

Edward R Ballister, Jessica Rodgers, Franck Martial, Robert J Lucas

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. GNature communications · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Gz Enhanced Signal Transduction assaY (GbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. A self-inactivating invertebrate opsin optically drives biased signaling toward Gβγ-dependent ion channel modulation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Chimeric human opsins as optogenetic light sensitisers.The Journal of experimental biology · 2021
    Article
  18. Decoding LncRNAs.Cancers · 2021
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Edward R BallisterUniversity of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Jessica RodgersUniversity of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Franck MartialUniversity of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Robert J LucasUniversity of Manchester, Manchester, UK. robert.lucas@manchester.ac.uk.
University of Manchester · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/K002252/1Medical Research Council G0801731Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnimal opsins are light-sensitive G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) that enable optogenetic control over the major heterotrimeric G-protein signaling pathways in animal cells. As such, opsins have potential applications in both biomedical research and therapy. Selecting the opsin with the best balance of activity and selectivity for a given application requires knowing their ability to couple to a full range of relevant Gα subunits. We present the GsX assay, a set of tools based on chimeric Gs subunits that transduce coupling of opsins to diverse G proteins into increases in cAMP levels,  measured with a real-time reporter in living cells. We use this assay to compare coupling to Gi/o/t across a panel of natural and chimeric opsins selected for potential application in gene therapy for retinal degeneration.

resultsOf the opsins tested, wild-type human rod opsin had the highest activity for chimeric Gs proxies for Gi and Gt (Gsi and Gst) and was matched in Go proxy (Gso) activity only by a human rod opsin/scallop opsin chimera. Rod opsin drove roughly equivalent responses via Gsi, Gso, and Gst, while cone opsins showed much lower activities with Gso than Gsi or Gst, and a human rod opsin/amphioxus opsin chimera demonstrated higher activity with Gso than with Gsi or Gst. We failed to detect activity for opsin chimeras bearing three intracellular fragments of mGluR6, and observed unexpectedly complex response profiles for scallop and amphioxus opsins thought to be specialized for Go.

conclusionsThese results identify rod opsin as the most potent non-selective Gi/o/t-coupled opsin, long-wave sensitive cone opsin as the best for selectively activating Gi/t over Go, and a rod opsin/amphioxus opsin chimera as the best choice for selectively activating Go over Gi/t.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceAnimalsGTP-Binding Protein alpha Subunits, Gi-GoHEK293 CellsHumansMiceOpsinsOptogeneticsReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledRetinal Cone Photoreceptor CellsRod OpsinsSignal TransductionGTP-Binding Protein alpha Subunits, Gi-GoOpsinsReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledRod OpsinsCell signalingGalphaOGene therapyGPCROpsinOptogeneticsRetinal degenerationSynthetic biology

Identifiers

PMID29338718
PMCPMC5771134
OpenAlexW2783624062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.