Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29338709›Full record

ArticleBMC biology2018

WorMachine: machine learning-based phenotypic analysis tool for worms.

Adam Hakim, Yael Mor, Itai Antoine Toker, Amir Levine, Moran Neuhof, Yishai Markovitz, Oded Rechavi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. High-Throughput Toxicity Screening withEnvironmental science & technology · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. HarnessingSensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Automation ofComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Towards Lifespan Automation forSensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Adam HakimSagol School of Neuroscience, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel. adamhakim@mail.tau.ac.il.
Yael MorSagol School of Neuroscience, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel. yaelmor@mail.tau.ac.il.
Itai Antoine TokerDepartment of Neurobiology, Wise Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Amir LevineDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Institute for Medical Research Israel-Canada (IMRIC), School of Medicine, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
Moran NeuhofDepartment of Neurobiology, Wise Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Yishai MarkovitzDepartment of Neurobiology, Wise Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Oded RechaviSagol School of Neuroscience, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel. odedrechavi@gmail.com.

Funding

Enhancing and expanding the CGC Strain CollectionP40OD010440 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI Ann E. Rougvie · 2012 to 2026
$7.5M
European Research Council 335624NIH HHS P40 OD010440
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCaenorhabditis elegans nematodes are powerful model organisms, yet quantification of visible phenotypes is still often labor-intensive, biased, and error-prone. We developed WorMachine, a three-step MATLAB-based image analysis software that allows (1) automated identification of C. elegans worms, (2) extraction of morphological features and quantification of fluorescent signals, and (3) machine learning techniques for high-level analysis.

resultsWe examined the power of WorMachine using five separate representative assays: supervised classification of binary-sex phenotype, scoring continuous-sexual phenotypes, quantifying the effects of two different RNA interference treatments, and measuring intracellular protein aggregation.

conclusionsWorMachine is suitable for analysis of a variety of biological questions and provides an accurate and reproducible analysis tool for measuring diverse phenotypes. It serves as a "quick and easy," convenient, high-throughput, and automated solution for nematode research.

Indexed as

Machine LearningPhenotypeAnimalsCaenorhabditis elegansFemaleGenetic TestingMaleOptical ImagingCaenorhabditis elegansDeep learningFeature extractionHigh-throughput image analysisImage processingMachine learningPhenotype analysis

Identifiers

PMID29338709
PMCPMC5769209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.