Observational studyBMC cardiovascular disorders2018
A simple prediction model to estimate obstructive coronary artery disease.
Observational study in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Construction and validation of a diagnostic model for obstructive coronary artery disease in patients with suspected unstable angina pectoris based on restingQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Comparative Performance of 3 Analytical Models in Identifying Associated Factors of Pulmonary Dysfunction-Depression Comorbidity: China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study-Based Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- Global Myocardial Work-Derived Nomogram for Coronary Stenosis Assessment in Stable Coronary Artery Disease: Development and External Validation.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Obstructive sleep apnea contributes to coronary artery disease development and poor prognosis.American journal of translational research · 2026Article
- Article
- Importance of incidental coronary artery calcification in early diagnosis of obstructive coronary artery disease.Polish journal of radiology · 2023Article
- Prediction of disorders with significant coronary lesions using machine learning in patients admitted with chest symptom.PloS one · 2022Article
- Cardiovascular diseases risk prediction in patients with diabetes: Posthoc analysis from a matched case-control study in Bangladesh.Journal of diabetes and metabolic disorders · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundA simple noninvasive model to predict obstructive coronary artery disease (OCAD) may promote risk stratification and reduce the burden of coronary artery disease (CAD). This study aimed to develop pre-procedural, noninvasive prediction models that better estimate the probability of OCAD among patients with suspected CAD undergoing elective coronary angiography (CAG).
methodsWe included 1262 patients, who had reliable Framingham risk variable data, in a cohort without known CAD from a prospective registry of patients referred for elective CAG. We investigated pre-procedural OCAD (≥50% stenosis in at least one major coronary vessel based on CAG) predictors.
resultsA total of 945 (74.9%) participants had OCAD. The final modified Framingham scoring (MFS) model consisted of anemia, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, left ventricular ejection fraction, and five Framingham factors (age, sex, total and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and hypertension). Bootstrap method (1000 times) revealed that the model demonstrated a good discriminative power (c statistic, 0.729 ± 0.0225; 95% CI, 0.69-0.77). MFS provided adequate goodness of fit (P = 0.43) and showed better performance than Framingham score (c statistic, 0.703 vs. 0.521; P < 0.001) in predicting OCAD, thereby identifying patients with high risks for OCAD (risk score ≥ 27) with ≥70% predictive value in 68.8% of subjects (range, 37.2-87.3% for low [≤17] and very high [≥41] risk scores).
conclusionOur data suggested that the simple MFS risk stratification tool, which is available in most primary-level clinics, showed good performance in estimating the probability of OCAD in relatively stable patients with suspected CAD; nevertheless, further validation is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.