Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29338309›Full record

ArticleExperimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.)2018

Oral microbiota reduce wound healing capacity of epithelial monolayers, irrespective of the presence of 5-fluorouracil.

Eline Vanlancker, Barbara Vanhoecke, Tom Sieprath, Janie Bourgeois, Annelore Beterams, Barbara De Moerloose, Winnok H De Vos, Tom Van de Wiele

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Updated perspectives on the contribution of the microbiome to the pathogenesis of mucositis using the MASCC/ISOO framework.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Armed to the Teeth-The Oral Mucosa Immunity System and Microbiota.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Observational
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Eline Vanlancker1 Center for Microbial Ecology and Technology (CMET), Ghent University, Ghent 9000, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-4183-0807
Barbara Vanhoecke1 Center for Microbial Ecology and Technology (CMET), Ghent University, Ghent 9000, Belgium.
Tom Sieprath2 Cell Systems and Cellular Imaging Group, Department of Molecular Biotechnology, Ghent University, Ghent 9000, Belgium.
Janie Bourgeois1 Center for Microbial Ecology and Technology (CMET), Ghent University, Ghent 9000, Belgium.
Annelore Beterams1 Center for Microbial Ecology and Technology (CMET), Ghent University, Ghent 9000, Belgium.
Barbara De Moerloose4 Department of Pediatric Hemato-Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent 9000, Belgium.
Winnok H De Vos2 Cell Systems and Cellular Imaging Group, Department of Molecular Biotechnology, Ghent University, Ghent 9000, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-0960-6781
Tom Van de Wiele1 Center for Microbial Ecology and Technology (CMET), Ghent University, Ghent 9000, Belgium.
Ghent University · BEUniversity of Antwerp · BEGhent University Hospital · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oral mucositis is still one of the most painful side effects of chemotherapeutic treatment and a mounting body of evidence suggests a key role for the oral microbiome in mucositis development. However, the underlying mechanisms remain elusive. In this work, we have investigated the interactions between the host, the microbiome, and chemotherapeutic treatments in more detail. The effect of 5-fluorouracil, commonly inducing mucositis, was assessed on a co-culture model that consists of an epithelial cell layer and a biofilm derived from oral microbiota from different types of samples (saliva, buccal swabs and tongue swabs) and donors (healthy individuals and patients suffering from mucositis). After 24 h co-incubation, all oral microbial samples were found to reduce wound healing capacity with 26 ± 15% as compared with untreated condition. Compared with saliva and tongue samples, buccal samples were characterized by lower bacterial cell counts and hence higher wound healing capacity. For samples from healthy individuals, an inverse correlation was observed between bacterial cell counts and wound healing capacity, whereas for patients suffering from mucositis no correlation was observed. Moreover, patient-derived samples had a less diverse microbial community and higher abundances of pathogenic genera. No major impact of 5-fluorouracil on wound healing capacity or the composition of the microbiome was seen at physiologically relevant concentrations in the mouth. In conclusion, bacterial cell count is inversely correlated with wound healing capacity, which emphasizes the importance of oral hygiene during oral wound healing in healthy individuals. However, future research on extra measures besides oral hygiene is needed to assure a good wound healing during mucositis, as for patients the bacterial composition seems also crucial. The direct effect of 5-fluorouracil on both the microbiome and wound healing is minimal, pointing to the importance of the host and its immune system in chemotherapy-induced microbial shifts. Impact statement Chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis has a major impact on the quality of life of patients. The additional costs and treatment time associated with this pathology are significant. Although the pathology of the disease is well understood, the role and importance of oral microbiota currently are less clear. In this study, we focused on the effect of oral microbiota on wound healing, the final phase of oral mucositis, during 5-FU exposure. We show that the bacterial load and composition have a major impact on the healing process in contrast to 5-FU which only marginally slows down healing. This emphasizes the importance of good oral health care during oral mucositis to minimize bacterial load around the oral lesions. However, since we show that also the composition of the oral microbiome plays a role in wound recovery, the identification of specific pathogenic species or their metabolites might be worthwhile to allow proper treatment.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaWound HealingAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic AgentsBacterial LoadCell Culture TechniquesChildChild, PreschoolFemaleFluorouracilHumansInfantInfant, NewbornAntineoplastic AgentsFluorouracilBacteriachemotherapyhost–microbe interactionsin vitro modelmicrobiomeoral mucositis

Identifiers

PMID29338309
PMCPMC6022929
OpenAlexW2784313729

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.