Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29338103›Full record

ReviewChemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany)2018

Interrogating Protein Phosphatases with Chemical Activity Probes.

Garrett R Casey, Cliff I Stains

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Unsaturated Phosphorus Electrophiles to Probe Protein Tyrosine Phosphatases.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2026
    Article
  3. Multipartite Fluorogenic Sensors for Monitoring Tyrosine Phosphatase Activity.Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Fluorogenic probes for imaging cellular phosphatase activity.Current opinion in chemical biology · 2020
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Garrett R CaseyDepartment of Chemistry, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, 68588, USA.
Cliff I StainsDepartment of Chemistry, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, 68588, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3165-4539

Funding

Chemical Approaches for Interrogating Fundamental Biomedical ProcessesR35GM119751 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI STAINS, CLIFF I · 2016 to 2020
$1.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM119751
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein phosphatases, while long overlooked, have recently become appreciated as drivers of both normal- and disease-associated signaling events. As a result, the spotlight is now turning torwards this enzyme family and efforts geared towards the development of modern chemical tools for studying these enzymes are well underway. This Minireview focuses on the evolution of chemical activity probes, both optical and covalent, for the study of protein phosphatases. Small-molecule probes, global monitoring of phosphatase activity through the use of covalent modifiers, and targeted fluorescence-based activity probes are discussed. We conclude with an overview of open questions in the field and highlight the potential impact of chemical tools for studying protein phosphatases.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiomarkersFluorescent DyesHumansKineticsPhosphoprotein PhosphatasesSignal TransductionBiomarkersFluorescent DyesPhosphoprotein Phosphatasesbiosensorsfluorescent probesphosphatasesensorssignal transduction

Identifiers

PMID29338103
PMCPMC5986605

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.