Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29337969›Full record

ArticleNature chemical biology2018

Toward an orthogonal central dogma.

Chang C Liu, Michael C Jewett, Jason W Chin, Chris A Voigt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature chemical biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The switch-liker's guide to plant synthetic gene circuits.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Chemical proteomics approaches for protein post-translational modification studies.Biochimica et biophysica acta. Proteins and proteomics · 2024
    Review
  11. Toward predictable universal genetic circuit design.Quantitative biology (Beijing, China) · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Socialized mitochondria: mitonuclear crosstalk in stress.Experimental & molecular medicine · 2024
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Engineering synthetic biomolecular condensates.Nature reviews bioengineering · 2023
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Chang C LiuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, the Department of Chemistry, and the Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California, USA.
Michael C JewettDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering and the Chemistry of Life Processes Institute, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, USA.
Jason W ChinMedical Research Council Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK, and the Department of Chemistry, Cambridge University, Cambridge, UK.
Chris A VoigtDepartment of Biological Engineering and the Synthetic Biology Center, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.

Funding

Diversity Supplement for A High-Throughput Continuous Evolution System for in vivo Biosensor EngineeringDP2GM119163 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI LIU, CHANG C · 2015 to 2017
$2.5M
Medical Research Council MC_U105181009Medical Research Council MC_UP_A024_1008NIGMS NIH HHS DP2 GM119163
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

DNA ReplicationProtein BiosynthesisSynthetic BiologyTranscription, GeneticBiotechnologyGenetic EngineeringHumansKluyveromycesMacromolecular SubstancesMitochondriaPlasmidsRibosomesMacromolecular Substances

Identifiers

PMID29337969
PMCPMC6339509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.