Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29337664›Full record

ArticleVector borne and zoonotic diseases (Larchmont, N.Y.)2018

Containment Studies of Transgenic Mosquitoes in Disease Endemic Countries: The Broad Concept of Facilities Readiness.

M Megan Quinlan, Josephine Birungi, Mamadou B Coulibaly, Abdoulaye Diabaté, Luca Facchinelli, Wolfgang Richard Mukabana, James Mutuku Mutunga, Tony Nolan, Peter Raymond, Sékou F Traoré

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vector borne and zoonotic diseases (Larchmont, N.Y.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Auditing Preparedness for Vector Control Field Studies.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2020
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

M Megan Quinlan1 Centre for Environmental Policy, Imperial College London , Ascot, United Kingdom .
Josephine Birungi2 Uganda Virus Research Institute (UVRI) , Entebbe, Uganda .
Mamadou B Coulibaly4 Université des Sciences , des Techniques et des Technologies de Bamako, Bamako, Mali .
Abdoulaye Diabaté5 Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé (IRSS)/Centre Muraz , Bobo Dioulasso, Burkina Faso .
Luca Facchinelli6 Department of Vector Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine , Liverpool, United Kingdom .
Wolfgang Richard Mukabana7 School of Biological Sciences, University of Nairobi , Nairobi, Kenya .
James Mutuku Mutunga9 International Center of Insect Physiology and Ecology (ICIPE) , Mbita Point, Kenya .
Tony Nolan1 Centre for Environmental Policy, Imperial College London , Ascot, United Kingdom .
Peter Raymond10 Donald Danforth Plant Science Center , St. Louis, Missouri.
Sékou F Traoré4 Université des Sciences , des Techniques et des Technologies de Bamako, Bamako, Mali .

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic strategies for large scale pest or vector control using modified insects are not yet operational in Africa, and currently rely on import of the modified strains to begin preliminary, contained studies. Early involvement of research teams from participating countries is crucial to evaluate candidate field interventions. Following the recommended phased approach for novel strategies, evaluation should begin with studies in containment facilities. Experiences to prepare facilities and build international teams for research on transgenic mosquitoes revealed some important organizing themes underlying the concept of "facilities readiness," or the point at which studies in containment may proceed, in sub-Saharan African settings. First, "compliance" for research with novel or non-native living organisms was defined as the fulfillment of all legislative and regulatory requirements. This is not limited to regulations regarding use of transgenic organisms. Second, the concept of "colony utility" was related to the characteristics of laboratory colonies being produced so that results of studies may be validated across time, sites, and strains or technologies; so that the appropriate candidate strains are moved forward toward field studies. Third, the importance of achieving "defensible science" was recognized, including that study conclusions can be traced back to evidence, covering the concerns of various stakeholders over the long term. This, combined with good stewardship of resources and appropriate funding, covers a diverse set of criteria for declaring when "facilities readiness" has been attained. It is proposed that, despite the additional demands on time and resources, only with the balance of and rigorous achievement of each of these organizing themes can collaborative research into novel strategies in vector or pest control reliably progress past initial containment studies.

Indexed as

Animals, Genetically ModifiedContainment of BiohazardsAfricaAnimalsCulicidaeEndemic DiseasesHumansInsect VectorsLaboratoriesMalariaMosquito Controlbiosafetycompliancecontainmentinsectarymosquitoestransgenic

Identifiers

PMID29337664
PMCPMC5770120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.