Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29337264›Full record

ArticleJournal of theoretical biology2018

Indirect reciprocity with negative assortment and limited information can promote cooperation.

Eleanor Brush, Åke Brännström, Ulf Dieckmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of theoretical biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Evolutionary stability of cooperation in indirect reciprocity under noisy and private assessment.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Eleanor BrushEvolution and Ecology Program, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, A-2361, Austria; Program in Quantitative and Computational Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA. Electronic address: ebrush@umd.edu.
Åke BrännströmEvolution and Ecology Program, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, A-2361, Austria; Department of Mathematics and Mathematical Statistics, Umeå University, Umeå, 901 87, Sweden.
Ulf DieckmannEvolution and Ecology Program, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, A-2361, Austria.

Funding

Quantitavie and Computational Biology Graduate ProgramT32HG003284 · NHGRI · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI Joshua Michael Akey, Stanislav Y. Shvartsman · 2004 to 2026
$9.9M
NHGRI NIH HHS T32 HG003284
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cooperation is ubiquitous in biological and social systems, even though cooperative behavior is often costly and at risk of exploitation by non-cooperators. Several studies have demonstrated that indirect reciprocity, whereby some members of a group observe the behaviors of their peers and use this information to discriminate against previously uncooperative agents in the future, can promote prosocial behavior. Some studies have shown that differential propensities of interacting among and between different types of agents (interaction assortment) can increase the effectiveness of indirect reciprocity. No previous studies have, however, considered differential propensities of observing the behaviors of different types of agents (information assortment). Furthermore, most previous studies have assumed that discriminators possess perfect information about others and incur no costs for gathering and storing this information. Here, we (1) consider both interaction assortment and information assortment, (2) assume discriminators have limited information about others, and (3) introduce a cost for information gathering and storage, in order to understand how the ability of discriminators to stabilize cooperation is affected by these steps toward increased realism. We report the following findings. First, cooperation can persist when agents preferentially interact with agents of other types or when discriminators preferentially observe other discriminators, even when they have limited information. Second, contrary to intuition, increasing the amount of information available to discriminators can exacerbate defection. Third, introducing costs of gathering and storing information makes it more difficult for discriminators to stabilize cooperation. Our study is one of only a few studies to date that show how negative interaction assortment can promote cooperation and broadens the set of circumstances in which it is know that cooperation can be maintained.

Indexed as

Biobehavioral SciencesCooperative BehaviorModels, BiologicalHumansEvolutionGame theoryKnowledgeReplicator dynamicsReputation

Identifiers

PMID29337264
PMCPMC5853132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.