ArticleThe Lancet. Oncology2018
Germline BRCA mutation and outcome in young-onset breast cancer (POSH): a prospective cohort study.
Article in The Lancet. Oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04533555 (Randomized Trial of Universal vs. Guideline-directed Germline Testing Among Young Adults With Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 262 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Randomized Trial of Universal vs. Guideline-directed Germline Testing Among Young Adults With Cancer
Who cites it
262 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 488 citations in OpenAlex.
- BRCA genes as candidates for colorectal cancer genetic testing panel: systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC cancer · 2023Pooled it
- Association between BRCA mutational status and survival in patients with breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2021Pooled it
- Neoadjuvant PARP inhibitor scheduling in BRCA1 and BRCA2 related breast cancer: PARTNER, a randomized phase II/III trial.Nature communications · 2025Trial
- A novel super-enhancer-related gene signature predicts prognosis and immune microenvironment for breast cancer.BMC cancer · 2023Trial
- A cost-consequences analysis of the SAFE trial: a comparative, effectiveness trial evaluating high- versus low-supervision of an exercise intervention for women with breast cancer.Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan) · 2023Trial
- All HER2-negative breast cancer patients need gBRCA testing: cost-effectiveness and clinical benefits.British journal of cancer · 2023Trial
- Pathologic complete response and survival according to germline BRCA1/2 status in triple-negative breast cancer.Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan) · 2026Article
- Clinicopathological characteristics and potential impact of previous treatment history in metachronous contralateral breast cancer: Insights from a real-world retrospective study.Oncology letters · 2026Article
- Divergent Prognostic Impact of GermlineCancers · 2026Article
- Frequency of germline pathogenic variants in breast cancer predisposing genes in a national cohort of young women with breast cancer.British journal of cancer · 2026Article
- Real-world clinical outcomes of patients with early-stage TNBC and BRCAm who were treated with adjuvant capecitabine in the United States.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2026Observational
- Surgical Management of Early-Onset Breast Cancer Among Young BRCA1 and BRCA2 Carriers.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Landscape of somatic genetic alterations and PAM50 intrinsic subtypes in breast cancer associated with germline pathogenic variants in DNA-repair genes.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2026Article
- Preoperative Germline Genetic Testing and Surgical Timing in Breast Cancer: Implementation of National Reimbursement Programs: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Outcomes and treatment patterns in germline BRCA1/2 carriers from two matched cohort studies.JNCI cancer spectrum · 2026Article
- Age-specific breast cancer incidence by subtype, TNM stage and screening status in Sweden 2008-2019 estimated with multiple imputation.International journal of cancer · 2026Article
- Germline Multigene Panel Testing in Women With Invasive Lobular Cancer.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Breastfeeding shapes a unique tumor-immune landscape in pregnancy-associated breast cancer from GEICAM-EMBARCAM study.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2026Article
- Comparative analysis of distinct genomic landscapes in young-onset gBRCA1/2 breast cancer.JCI insight · 2026Article
- Risk-reducing surgery, risk-reducing medication, and surveillance in youngTranslational cancer research · 2026Article
202 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
24 authors at 11 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRetrospective studies provide conflicting interpretations of the effect of inherited genetic factors on the prognosis of patients with breast cancer. The primary aim of this study was to determine the effect of a germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation on breast cancer outcomes in patients with young-onset breast cancer.
methodsWe did a prospective cohort study of female patients recruited from 127 hospitals in the UK aged 40 years or younger at first diagnosis (by histological confirmation) of invasive breast cancer. Patients with a previous invasive malignancy (except non-melanomatous skin cancer) were excluded. Patients were identified within 12 months of initial diagnosis. BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations were identified using blood DNA collected at recruitment. Clinicopathological data, and data regarding treatment and long-term outcomes, including date and site of disease recurrence, were collected from routine medical records at 6 months, 12 months, and then annually until death or loss to follow-up. The primary outcome was overall survival for all BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers (BRCA-positive) versus all non-carriers (BRCA-negative) at 2 years, 5 years, and 10 years after diagnosis. A prespecified subgroup analysis of overall survival was done in patients with triple-negative breast cancer. Recruitment was completed in 2008, and long-term follow-up is continuing.
findingsBetween Jan 24, 2000, and Jan 24, 2008, we recruited 2733 women. Genotyping detected a pathogenic BRCA mutation in 338 (12%) patients (201 with BRCA1, 137 with BRCA2). After a median follow-up of 8·2 years (IQR 6·0-9·9), 651 (96%) of 678 deaths were due to breast cancer. There was no significant difference in overall survival between BRCA-positive and BRCA-negative patients in multivariable analyses at any timepoint (at 2 years: 97·0% [95% CI 94·5-98·4] vs 96·6% [95·8-97·3]; at 5 years: 83·8% [79·3-87·5] vs 85·0% [83·5-86·4]; at 10 years: 73·4% [67·4-78·5] vs 70·1% [67·7-72·3]; hazard ratio [HR] 0·96 [95% CI 0·76-1·22]; p=0·76). Of 558 patients with triple-negative breast cancer, BRCA mutation carriers had better overall survival than non-carriers at 2 years (95% [95% CI 89-97] vs 91% [88-94]; HR 0·59 [95% CI 0·35-0·99]; p=0·047) but not 5 years (81% [73-87] vs 74% [70-78]; HR 1·13 [0·70-1·84]; p=0·62) or 10 years (72% [62-80] vs 69% [63-74]; HR 2·12 [0·82-5·49]; p= 0·12).
interpretationPatients with young-onset breast cancer who carry a BRCA mutation have similar survival as non-carriers. However, BRCA mutation carriers with triple-negative breast cancer might have a survival advantage during the first few years after diagnosis compared with non-carriers. Decisions about timing of additional surgery aimed at reducing future second primary-cancer risks should take into account patient prognosis associated with the first malignancy and patient preferences.
fundingCancer Research UK, the UK National Cancer Research Network, the Wessex Cancer Trust, Breast Cancer Now, and the PPP Healthcare Medical Trust Grant.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.