Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29336925›Full record

ArticleVaccine2018

A novel inactivated vaccine against Lawsonia intracellularis induces rapid induction of humoral immunity, reduction of bacterial shedding and provides robust gut barrier function.

F Roerink, C L Morgan, S M Knetter, M-H Passat, A L Archibald, T Ait-Ali, E L Strait

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Efficiency of Commercial and Test Vaccines Against Lawsonia intracellularis on Clinical and Immunological Parameters in Swine: A Systematic Review.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Journal of veterinary science · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Efficacy of a novel intradermalPorcine health management · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

F RoerinkMerck Animal Health, 2 Giralda Farms, Madison, NJ 07940, USA. Electronic address: frank.roerink@merck.com.
C L MorganMerck Animal Health, 2 Giralda Farms, Madison, NJ 07940, USA.
S M KnetterMerck Animal Health, 2 Giralda Farms, Madison, NJ 07940, USA.
M-H PassatThe Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Campus, Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9RG, UK.
A L ArchibaldThe Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Campus, Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9RG, UK.
T Ait-AliThe Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Campus, Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9RG, UK. Electronic address: tahar.aitali@roslin.ed.ac.uk.
E L StraitMerck Animal Health, 2 Giralda Farms, Madison, NJ 07940, USA.
Roslin Institute · GBUniversity of Edinburgh · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/J004227/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/P013740/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Porcine proliferative ileitis is a major economic burden for the swine industry, affecting growing pigs and young adult pigs. In this study, the protective efficacy of an inactivated, injectable whole-cell bacteria vaccine against L. intracellularis - Porcilis® Ileitis was evaluated under field conditions. Eighty-five, three-week-old pigs on a commercial farrow-to-finish farm were vaccinated by the intramuscular route, either with a dose of injectable vaccine, or with saline. A subset of vaccinates and control pigs were necropsied at 21 days post-challenge. Incidence and severity of ileitis were evaluated by gross and microscopic observation of ileal tissues. Colonization of the gut after challenge was examined by L. intracellularis-specific immunohistochemistry, and qPCR of ileal scrapings. Integrity of the intestinal barrier was evaluated to quantify a range of intestinal markers including secreted mucin and intestinal alkaline phosphatase, and innate immune markers including Caspase-3 and Calprotectin. A second subset of pigs was monitored for fecal shedding of L. intracellularis, until resolution of shedding. Our investigation indicated that Porcilis Ileitis provided robust protection against ileitis, reduced bacterial shedding 15-fold (p < .05) and preserved normal gut barrier function in the face of an experimental challenge with virulent L. intracellularis.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, BacterialBacterial SheddingBacterial VaccinesDesulfovibrionaceae InfectionsFecesFemaleImmunizationIntestinesLawsonia BacteriaMaleSwineSwine DiseasesVaccines, InactivatedAntibodies, BacterialBacterial VaccinesVaccines, InactivatedEfficacyIleitisIntestinal integrityLawsonia intracellularisSwineVaccine

Identifiers

PMID29336925
PMCPMC5846845
OpenAlexW2784168771

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.