Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29336508›Full record

ArticleHIV medicine2018

National audit of perinatal HIV infections in the UK, 2006-2013: what lessons can be learnt?

H Peters, C Thorne, P A Tookey, L Byrne

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in HIV medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Update on HIV prevention and management in pregnancy Number 10 - 2025.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2025
    Article
  5. Bictegravir Use During Pregnancy: A Multicenter Retrospective Analysis Evaluating HIV Viral Suppression and Perinatal Outcomes.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Antenatal HIV screening: results from the National Perinatal Survey, France, 2016.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

H PetersPopulation Policy & Practice Programme, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK.
C ThornePopulation Policy & Practice Programme, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK.
P A TookeyPopulation Policy & Practice Programme, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK.
L ByrnePopulation Policy & Practice Programme, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK.
Great Ormond Street Hospital · GBUniversity College London · GB

Funding

Department of HealthMedical Research Council MR/J013706/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe aim of the study was to investigate circumstances surrounding perinatal transmissions of HIV (PHIVs) in the UK.

methodsThe National Study of HIV in Pregnancy and Childhood conducts comprehensive surveillance of all pregnancies in women diagnosed with HIV infection and their infants in the UK; reports of all HIV-diagnosed children are also sought, regardless of country of birth. Children with PHIV born in 2006-2013 and reported by 2014 were included in an audit, with additional data collection via telephone interviews with clinicians involved in each case. Contributing factors for each transmission were identified, and cases described according to main likely contributing factor, by maternal diagnosis timing.

resultsA total of 108 PHIVs were identified. Of the 41 (38%) infants whose mothers were diagnosed before delivery, it is probable that most were infected in utero, around 20% intrapartum and 20% through breastfeeding. Timing of transmission was unknown for most children of undiagnosed mothers. For infants born to diagnosed women, the most common contributing factors for transmission were difficulties with engagement and/or antiretroviral therapy (ART) adherence in pregnancy (14 of 41) and late antenatal booking (nine of 41); for the 67 children with undiagnosed mothers, these were decline of HIV testing (28 of 67) and seroconversion (23 of 67). Adverse social circumstances around the time of pregnancy were reported for 53% of women, including uncertain immigration status, housing problems and intimate partner violence. Eight children died, all born to undiagnosed mothers.

conclusionsPriority areas requiring improvement include reducing incident infections, improving ART adherence and facilitating better engagement in care, with attention to addressing the health inequalities and adverse social situations faced by these women.

Indexed as

AdultChildChild, PreschoolData CollectionFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansInfantInfectious Disease Transmission, VerticalMaternal AgePatient CompliancePopulation SurveillancePregnancyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousRisk FactorsUnited KingdomHIVperinatal infectionpregnancyprevention of mother-to-child transmissionUK

Identifiers

PMID29336508
PMCPMC5901012
OpenAlexW2783857760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.