ArticleThe Analyst2018
High temporal resolution delayed analysis of clinical microdialysate streams.
Article in The Analyst, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Portable Microfluidic Biosensing System for Real-Time Analysis of Microdialysate in Transplant Kidneys.Analytical chemistry · 2019Article
- A rotating operant chamber for use with microdialysis.Journal of neuroscience methods · 2019Article
- Clinical translation of microfluidic sensor devices: focus on calibration and analytical robustness.Lab on a chip · 2019Article
- Machine Perfusion and the Pancreas: Will It Increase the Donor Pool?Current diabetes reports · 2019Review
- 3D printed microfluidic device for online detection of neurochemical changes with high temporal resolution in human brain microdialysate.Lab on a chip · 2019Article
- An improved rapid sampling microdialysis system for human and porcine organ monitoring in a hospital setting.Analytical methods : advancing methods and applications · 2018Article
- Clinical value of bioelectrical properties of cancerous tissue in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer patients.Scientific reports · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This paper presents the use of tubing to store clinical microdialysis samples for delayed analysis with high temporal resolution, offering an alternative to traditional discrete offline microdialysis sampling. Samples stored in this way were found to be stable for up to 72 days at -80 °C. Examples of how this methodology can be applied to glucose and lactate measurement in a wide range of in vivo monitoring experiments are presented. This paper presents a general model, which allows for an informed choice of tubing parameters for a given storage time and flow rate avoiding high back pressure, which would otherwise cause the microdialysis probe to leak, while maximising temporal resolution.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.