Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29336288›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of rhinology & allergy2018

How often is sinus surgery performed for chronic rhinosinusitis with versus without nasal polyps?

Elisabeth H Ference, Jeffrey D Suh, Bruce K Tan, Stephanie Shintani Smith

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of rhinology & allergy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Time is money: An analysis of cost drivers in ambulatory sinus surgery.International forum of allergy & rhinology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Elisabeth H FerenceFrom the Rick and Tina Caruso Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.
Jeffrey D SuhDepartment of Head and Neck Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine of the University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
Bruce K TanDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
Stephanie Shintani SmithDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
Northwestern University · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

Systems Genetics Approach to Gene Discovery in Chronic RhinosinusitisU19AI106683 · NIAID · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI KERN, ROBERT C · 2014 to 2017
$7.9M
Northwestern University Patient-centered Intervention and Engagement TrainingK12HS023011 · AHRQ · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI CELLA, DAVID · 2014 to 2018
$3.7M
Role for B-cell mediated olfactory loss in Chronic Sinusitis with Nasal PolypsK23DC012067 · NIDCD · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI TAN, BRUCE K · 2012 to 2016
$1.1M
AHRQ HHS K12 HS023011NIAID NIH HHS L30 AI133817NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI106683NIDCD NIH HHS K23 DC012067
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere currently are no data on the relative frequency of endoscopic sinus surgeries (ESS) performed for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP) versus chronic rhinosinusitis without nasal polyposis (CRSsNP) in the United States.

objectivesTo compare the rate of surgical interventions for CRSwNP and CRSsNP.

methodsCases identified by CPT codes were extracted from the 2009-2011 State Ambulatory Surgery Databases for California, Florida, Maryland, and New York. Patient demographics, extent of surgery, mean charges, and operating room (OR) time were compared.

resultsA total of 97,228 ESS cases were performed in the four states; 29.3% of surgeries were for patients with CRSwNP, 66.0% of patients with CRSsNP, and 4.8% for other indications. The proportion of ESS for CRSwNP varied across states, with California having the highest percentage (34.6%) and Maryland having the lowest (26.4%) (p < 0.0001). Patients with Medicaid (33.8%) and Medicare (32.2%) had higher rates of surgery for CRSwNP compared with patients with private insurance (29.9%) (p < 0.001). Surgeons who performed a higher volume of sinus surgery compared to lower volume surgeons performed a lower percentage of surgery for CRSwNP (24.4 versus 33.5%; p < 0.001). ESS cases for CRSwNP were more extensive (relative risk of four sinus surgeries of 1.88; p < 0.0001), used image guidance more frequently (relative risk, 1.39; p < 0.0001), and were less likely to include a balloon procedure (relative risk, 0.69; p < 0.0001). Patients with CRSwNP had longer OR times (ESS that involved all four sinuses took 14 minutes longer) (p < 0.0001), but no difference in charges compared with patients with CRSsNP who underwent a similar extent of surgery.

conclusionAlmost 30% of ESS were performed for CRSwNP, and these cases were, on average, more extensive, used more OR time, and more often used image guidance than surgeries for CRSsNP. The rate of surgery performed for CRSwNP varied based on geography, payer, and surgical volume, which indicted that patient selection impacted surgical management.

Indexed as

AdultAgedChronic DiseaseCost-Benefit AnalysisEndoscopyFemaleHumansMaleMedicareMiddle AgedNasal PolypsParanasal SinusesRhinitisSinusitisSurgery, Computer-AssistedUnited States

Identifiers

PMID29336288
PMCPMC5780330
OpenAlexW2783581029

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.