ArticleClinical rheumatology2018
Splenectomy in systemic lupus erythematosus and autoimmune hematologic disease: a comparative analysis.
Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- 2025 Chinese guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus.Rheumatology and immunology research · 2025Article
- The Role of the Spleen and the Place of Splenectomy in Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia-A Review of Current Knowledge.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Low-dose rituximab therapy in steroid-refractory thrombocytopenia due to systemic lupus erythematosus.Rheumatology international · 2020Review
- Management of Non-criteria Manifestations in Antiphospholipid Syndrome.Current rheumatology reports · 2020Review
- Proinflammatory α-Adrenergic Neuronal Regulation of Splenic IFN-γ, IL-6, and TGF-β of Mice from Day 15 onwards in Arthritis.Neuroimmunomodulation · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objective of the study is to analyze the efficacy and safety of splenectomy in the management of refractory autoimmune thrombocytopenia (AT)/autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) associated or not with systemic lupus erythematosus. Thirty-four patients after splenectomy due to severe AT and/or AIHA were divided into group 1 (G1) 18 SLE/APS patients: 9 AT/SLE patients, 6 SLE/antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), and 3 primary APS. Group 2 (G2): 16 patients without SLE/APS: 2 Fisher-Evans syndrome and 14 AIHA. Surgery approach when (1) platelets ≤ 50,000/ml despite 2 weeks on medical therapy, (2) medically dependent, and (3) medically intolerant or after two hemolytic crises in AIHA patients. Splenectomy response: (1) complete (CR): ≥ 150,000 platelets/ml, (2) partial: 50,000-149,000/ml, or (3) none: ≤ 50,000/ml. CR for AIHA: hemoglobin ≥9 g/dl. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: descriptive statistics and chi-square test. The mean age was 34.6 years; mean follow-up: 28.5 months. Open splenectomy in 15/34 vs laparoscopy in 19/34 (p = NS). CR in 15/34, G1: 4/18, G2: 11/16, (p = 0.006). Complications in 6/34, 5 from G2 vs 1 from G1 (p = 0.05). Relapse in 7/18 patients in G1 and 3/16 in G2 (p = 0.05). Open and laparoscopic splenectomies in SLE and AT patients are as effective as in those without SLE; however, patients with SLE and APS had more relapses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.