Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29335872›Full record

ArticleJournal of computer-aided molecular design2018

Disruptor of telomeric silencing 1-like (DOT1L): disclosing a new class of non-nucleoside inhibitors by means of ligand-based and structure-based approaches.

Manuela Sabatino, Dante Rotili, Alexandros Patsilinakos, Mariantonietta Forgione, Daniela Tomaselli, Fréderic Alby, Paola B Arimondo, Antonello Mai, Rino Ragno

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of computer-aided molecular design, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. QSPR study on the polyacrylate-water partition coefficients of hydrophobic organic compounds.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Manuela SabatinoRome Center for Molecular Design, Dipartimento di Chimica e Tecnologie del Farmaco, Sapienza Università di Roma, P. le A. Moro 5, 00185, Roma, Italy.
Dante RotiliDipartimento di Chimica e Tecnologie del Farmaco, Istituto Pasteur - Fondazione Cenci Bolognetti, Sapienza Università di Roma, P. le A. Moro 5, 00185, Roma, Italy.
Alexandros PatsilinakosRome Center for Molecular Design, Dipartimento di Chimica e Tecnologie del Farmaco, Sapienza Università di Roma, P. le A. Moro 5, 00185, Roma, Italy.
Mariantonietta ForgioneDipartimento di Chimica e Tecnologie del Farmaco, Istituto Pasteur - Fondazione Cenci Bolognetti, Sapienza Università di Roma, P. le A. Moro 5, 00185, Roma, Italy.
Daniela TomaselliDipartimento di Chimica e Tecnologie del Farmaco, Istituto Pasteur - Fondazione Cenci Bolognetti, Sapienza Università di Roma, P. le A. Moro 5, 00185, Roma, Italy.
Fréderic AlbyLaboratoire Pierre Fabre, 3 Avenue H. Curien, 31100, Toulouse, France.
Paola B ArimondoCNRS FRE3600 ETaC, Bât IBCG, Toulouse, France.
Antonello MaiDipartimento di Chimica e Tecnologie del Farmaco, Istituto Pasteur - Fondazione Cenci Bolognetti, Sapienza Università di Roma, P. le A. Moro 5, 00185, Roma, Italy. antonello.mai@uniroma1.it.
Rino RagnoRome Center for Molecular Design, Dipartimento di Chimica e Tecnologie del Farmaco, Sapienza Università di Roma, P. le A. Moro 5, 00185, Roma, Italy. rino.ragno@uniroma1.it.ORCID 0000-0001-5399-975X
Istituto Pasteur · ITCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRIR Dynamics (United States) · USPierre Fabre (France) · FR

Funding

Histone Lysine deMethylation: Structures, Inhibitions and MechanismsR01GM114306 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI CHENG, XIAODONG · 2015 to 2018
$1.2M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chemical inhibition of chromatin-mediated signaling involved proteins is an established strategy to drive expression networks and alter disease progression. Protein methyltransferases are among the most studied proteins in epigenetics and, in particular, disruptor of telomeric silencing 1-like (DOT1L) lysine methyltransferase plays a key role in MLL-rearranged acute leukemia Selective inhibition of DOT1L is an established attractive strategy to breakdown aberrant H3K79 methylation and thus overexpression of leukemia genes, and leukemogenesis. Although numerous DOT1L inhibitors have been several structural data published no pronounced computational efforts have been yet reported. In these studies a first tentative of multi-stage and LB/SB combined approach is reported in order to maximize the use of available data. Using co-crystallized ligand/DOT1L complexes, predictive 3-D QSAR and COMBINE models were built through a python implementation of previously reported methodologies. The models, validated by either modeled or experimental external test sets, proved to have good predictive abilities. The application of these models to an internal library led to the selection of two unreported compounds that were found able to inhibit DOT1L at micromolar level. To the best of our knowledge this is the first report of quantitative LB and SB DOT1L inhibitors models and their application to disclose new potential epigenetic modulators.

Indexed as

Models, MolecularDrug DesignEnzyme InhibitorsLigandsMethyltransferasesProtein BindingProtein ConformationQuantitative Structure-Activity RelationshipEnzyme InhibitorsLigandsMethyltransferases3-D QSARCOMBINEDisruptor of telomeric silencing 1-like (DOT1L)Ligand-Based Drug DesignStructure-Based Drug Design

Identifiers

PMID29335872
OpenAlexW2784108533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.