Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29335868›Full record

Observational studyEuropean radiology2018

Added value of ancillary imaging features for differentiating scirrhous hepatocellular carcinoma from intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging.

Seo-Youn Choi, Young Kon Kim, Ji Hye Min, Tae Wook Kang, Woo Kyoung Jeong, Soohyun Ahn, Hojeong Won

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in European radiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Seo-Youn ChoiDepartment of Radiology, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Bucheon Hospital, 170 Jomaru-ro, Wonmi-gu, Bucheon-Si, Gyeonggi-do, 14584, Korea.
Young Kon KimDepartment of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Ilwon-Ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Korea. youngkon0707.kim@samsung.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3070-4880
Ji Hye MinDepartment of Radiology, Chungnam National University Hospital, Chungnam National University College of Medicine, 282 Munhwa-ro, Jung-gu, Daejeon, 35015, Korea.
Tae Wook KangDepartment of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Ilwon-Ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Korea.
Woo Kyoung JeongDepartment of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Ilwon-Ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Korea.
Soohyun AhnBiostatics and Clinical Epidemiology Center, Research Institute for Future Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, 06351, Korea.
Hojeong WonBiostatics and Clinical Epidemiology Center, Research Institute for Future Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, 06351, Korea.
Samsung Medical Center · KRChungnam National University Hospital · KRSoonchunhyang University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo determine ancillary features that help distinguish between scirrhous hepatocellular carcinoma (S-HCC) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) and investigate added value of ancillary features to enhancement pattern-based diagnosis on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI.

methodsThis retrospective study included 96 patients with S-HCCs and 120 patients with ICCs who underwent gadoxetic acid MRI before surgical resection. Two observers reviewed MRIs of the tumours. After determining ancillary features for differentiating tumour types, we measured the diagnostic performance of adding ancillary features to enhancement pattern-based diagnosis.

resultsT2 central darkness, capsule and septum were significant and independent features differentiating S-HCC from ICC (p ≤ .06). Adding ancillary features to enhancement pattern led to increased accuracy (observer 1, 78.9 vs. 93.8 %; observer 2, 80.3 vs. 92.8 %; p < .001), sensitivity (observer 1, 74.5 vs. 96.4 %; observer 2, 77.1 vs. 93.2 %; p < .001 and .001), and specificity (observer 1, 82.5 vs. 91.7 %; observer 2, 82.9 vs. 92.5 %; p = .006 and .005) for diagnosis of S-HCC by differentiation from ICC.

conclusionsAdding ancillary features capsule, septum and T2 central darkness to conventional enhancement patterns on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI improved accuracy, sensitivity and specificity for S-HCC diagnosis with differentiation from ICC. KEY POINTS: • Capsule, septum, and T2 central darkness were ancillary features for S-HCC. • A typical HCC enhancement was seen in 31.3% of S-HCCs. • Ancillary MRI features were useful in differentiation between S-HCC and ICC.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBile Duct NeoplasmsBile Ducts, IntrahepaticCarcinoma, HepatocellularCell DifferentiationCholangiocarcinomaContrast MediaDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleGadolinium DTPAHumansLiver NeoplasmsMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedContrast MediaGadolinium DTPAgadolinium ethoxybenzyl DTPABile duct neoplasmCarcinoma, hepatocellularCholangiocarcinomaLiver neoplasmsMagnetic resonance imaging

Identifiers

PMID29335868
OpenAlexW2783803313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.