Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29335748›Full record

Trial reportKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2018

Hydrogel implant is as effective as osteochondral autologous transplantation for treating focal cartilage knee injury in 24 months.

Antonio Altenor Bessa de Queiroz, Pedro Debieux, Joicemar Amaro, Mario Ferretti, Moises Cohen

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. [Effectiveness of arthroscopic microfracture combined with osteochondral autologous transplantation for large area cartilage injury of femoral condyle of knee].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Antonio Altenor Bessa de QueirozDepartamento de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Rua Borges Lagoa, 783 5° Andar, São Paulo, SP, CEP 04038-031, Brazil.
Pedro DebieuxDepartamento de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Rua Borges Lagoa, 783 5° Andar, São Paulo, SP, CEP 04038-031, Brazil. pedrod.ortop@gmail.com.
Joicemar AmaroDepartamento de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Rua Borges Lagoa, 783 5° Andar, São Paulo, SP, CEP 04038-031, Brazil.
Mario FerrettiDepartamento de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Rua Borges Lagoa, 783 5° Andar, São Paulo, SP, CEP 04038-031, Brazil.
Moises CohenDepartamento de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Rua Borges Lagoa, 783 5° Andar, São Paulo, SP, CEP 04038-031, Brazil.
Associação Paulista de Medicina · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe treatment approach for a patient with knee joint focal cartilage lesion is a difficult decision. To date, there has been no randomized clinical trial involving Hydrogel (Cartiva™). This study evaluated and compared the results of a hydrogel implant (Cartiva™) with autologous osteochondral transplantation (AOT) for treating knee joint focal cartilage lesions.

methodsThirty-eight symptomatic patients, with a focal cartilage lesion of Outerbridge grades III or IV, were randomized into one of two groups according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Group I underwent AOT, and Group II was treated with a Hydrogel implant. Patients were evaluated preoperatively and again postoperatively at 6, 12, and 24 months using the subjective International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores, Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS Pain), Activities of Daily Living Scale (ADLS) and Lysholm score.

resultsBoth groups showed significant improvements from baseline (pre-surgery) to post-surgery (6, 12, and 24 months; p < 0.05), but there was no difference between the groups. Regarding complications, prolonged pain was observed in four patients (10.5%), two from each group, with a regression of symptoms within 1 year.

conclusionThe Hydrogel implant showed similar efficiency as the autologous osteochondral graft for treating knee joint focal cartilage lesions. Both techniques showed satisfactory results compared to preoperative status. The Hydrogel implant was safe and effective, and it provided good stability and joint function at 2-year follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I.

Indexed as

Bone TransplantationHydrogelsProstheses and ImplantsActivities of Daily LivingAdultCartilage, ArticularFemaleHumansKnee InjuriesKnee JointMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementQuality of LifeTransplantation, AutologousTreatment OutcomeHydrogelsAutologous osteochondral transplantationFocal cartilage lesionHydrogel

Identifiers

PMID29335748
OpenAlexW2782565181

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.