Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29335747›Full record

SynthesisKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2018

Patellar resurfacing versus patellar retention in primary total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review of overlapping meta-analyses.

Alberto Grassi, Riccardo Compagnoni, Paolo Ferrua, Stefano Zaffagnini, Massimo Berruto, Kristian Samuelsson, Eleonor Svantesson, Pietro Randelli

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. [Long-term effectiveness of different patellar treatments in primary total knee arthroplasty].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2022
    Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Does patellar resurfacing matter in robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty with functional alignment principles?Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Alberto GrassiLaboratorio di Biomeccanica ed Innovazione Tecnologica, Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy.
Riccardo CompagnoniASST Centro specialistico Ortopedico Traumatologico Gaetano Pini - CTO, Milano, Italy. riccardo.compagnoni@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8259-8488
Paolo FerruaASST Centro specialistico Ortopedico Traumatologico Gaetano Pini - CTO, Milano, Italy.
Stefano ZaffagniniIIa Clinica Ortopedica e Traumatologica, Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy.
Massimo BerrutoASST Centro specialistico Ortopedico Traumatologico Gaetano Pini - CTO, Milano, Italy.
Kristian SamuelssonDepartment of Orthopedics, Institute of Clinical Science, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Eleonor SvantessonDepartment of Orthopedics, Institute of Clinical Science, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Pietro RandelliASST Centro specialistico Ortopedico Traumatologico Gaetano Pini - CTO, Milano, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe need of patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a subject of debate. This systematic review of overlapping meta-analyses aimed to assess and analyze current evidence regarding patellar resurfacing and non-resurfacing in TKA.

methodsA systematic literature search was performed in March 2017 in PubMed, CINAHL and Cochrane Library. Inclusion criteria were meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that compared TKA with and without patellar resurfacing considering as outcomes re-operations rate, complications, anterior knee pain, functional scores. The quality of meta-analyses was evaluated with AMSTAR score and the most relevant meta-analysis was determined by applying the Jadad algorithm.

resultsTen meta-analyses, published between 2005 and 2015, were included in the systematic review. Two studies found a significantly increased Knee Society Score in the resurfacing group. According to four meta-analyses, anterior knee pain incidence was lower in resurfacing group. Six of the included studies described a greater risk of re-intervention in the non-resurfacing groups. The overall quality of included studies was moderate. The most relevant meta-analysis reported no differences in functional scores and incidence of anterior knee pain between the groups.

conclusionsComparable outcomes were found when comparing patellar resurfacing and non-resurfacing in TKA. The higher risk of re-operations after non-resurfacing should be interpreted with caution due to the methodological limitations of the meta-analyses regarding search criteria, heterogeneity and the inherent bias of easier indication to reoperation when the patella is not resurfaced. There is no clear superiority of patellar resurfacing compared to patellar retention. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, systematic review of meta-analyses.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeHumansJoint DiseasesKnee JointMeta-Analysis as TopicPatellaRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicArthroplastyKneeMeta-analysisPatellaPatellar resurfacingPatellofemoralReplacementReview

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.