Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29335675›Full record

ArticleSocial currents2017

Exit, cohesion, and consensus: social psychological moderators of consensus among adolescent peer groups.

Jacob C Fisher

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Social currents, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Jacob C FisherDuke University.

Funding

Partnership Model for Diffusion of Proven PreventionR01DA013709 · NIDA · IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SPOTH, RICHARD · 2002 to 2017
$35.0M
Population Research InstituteR24HD041025 · NICHD · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY-UNIV PARK · PI MATTHEWS, STEPHEN A · 2001 to 2016
$9.7M
The Population Research Institute: Development CoreP2CHD041025 · NICHD · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI Sarah Damaske · 2016 to 2026
$9.0M
T32 Administrative Supplement for Increase in Postdoc StipendsT32AG000139 · NIA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI LYNCH, SCOTT M. · 1987 to 2017
$4.0M
Rural Family and Community Drug Abuse Prevention ProjectR01AA014702 · NIAAA · IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SPOTH, RICHARD · 2003 to 2007
$3.0M
Friendship Networks and Emergence of Substance UseR01DA018225 · NIDA · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI FEINBERG, MARK ETHAN · 2007 to 2017
$2.9M
Models and Tools for Dynamic Health-Relevant Diffusion over Complex NetworksR01HD075712 · NICHD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI MOODY, JAMES, MUCHA, PETER JOHN · 2013 to 2018
$1.8M
Focused Training in Social Networks and HealthR25HD079352 · NICHD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI MOODY, JAMES · 2015 to 2024
$1.6M
NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA014702NIA NIH HHS T32 AG000139NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD041025NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD075712NICHD NIH HHS R24 HD041025NICHD NIH HHS R25 HD079352NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA013709NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA018225
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Virtually all social diffusion work relies on a common formal basis, which predicts that consensus will develop among a connected population as the result of diffusion. In spite of the popularity of social diffusion models that predict consensus, few empirical studies examine consensus, or a clustering of attitudes, directly. Those that do either focus on the coordinating role of strict hierarchies, or on the results of online experiments, and do not consider how consensus occurs among groups

Identifiers

PMID29335675
PMCPMC5766436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.