Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29335640›Full record

ArticleThe ISME journal2018

The stage of soil development modulates rhizosphere effect along a High Arctic desert chronosequence.

Francesca Mapelli, Ramona Marasco, Marco Fusi, Barbara Scaglia, George Tsiamis, Eleonora Rolli, Stilianos Fodelianakis, Kostas Bourtzis, Stefano Ventura, Fulvia Tambone and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The ISME journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Francesca MapelliDepartment of Food, Environmental and Nutritional Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, 20133, Italy.
Ramona MarascoKing Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Biological and Environmental Sciences and Engineering Division (BESE), Thuwal, 23955-6900, Saudi Arabia.
Marco FusiKing Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Biological and Environmental Sciences and Engineering Division (BESE), Thuwal, 23955-6900, Saudi Arabia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7433-2487
Barbara ScagliaDepartment of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences-Production, Landscape, Agroenergy, University of Milan, Milan, 20133, Italy.
George TsiamisDepartment of Environmental and Natural Resources Management, University of Patras, Agrinio, 30100, Greece.
Eleonora RolliDepartment of Food, Environmental and Nutritional Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, 20133, Italy.
Stilianos FodelianakisKing Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Biological and Environmental Sciences and Engineering Division (BESE), Thuwal, 23955-6900, Saudi Arabia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2186-6009
Kostas BourtzisDepartment of Environmental and Natural Resources Management, University of Patras, Agrinio, 30100, Greece.
Stefano VenturaInstitute of Ecosystem Study, CNR, Sesto Fiorentino, 50019, Italy.
Fulvia TamboneDepartment of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences-Production, Landscape, Agroenergy, University of Milan, Milan, 20133, Italy.
Fabrizio AdaniDepartment of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences-Production, Landscape, Agroenergy, University of Milan, Milan, 20133, Italy.
Sara BorinDepartment of Food, Environmental and Nutritional Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, 20133, Italy. sara.borin@unimi.it.
Daniele DaffonchioDepartment of Food, Environmental and Nutritional Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, 20133, Italy. daniele.daffonchio@kaust.edu.sa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0947-925X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In mature soils, plant species and soil type determine the selection of root microbiota. Which of these two factors drives rhizosphere selection in barren substrates of developing desert soils has, however, not yet been established. Chronosequences of glacier forelands provide ideal natural environments to identify primary rhizosphere selection factors along the changing edaphic conditions of a developing soil. Here, we analyze changes in bacterial diversity in bulk soils and rhizospheres of a pioneer plant across a High Arctic glacier chronosequence. We show that the developmental stage of soil strongly modulates rhizosphere community assembly, even though plant-induced selection buffers the effect of changing edaphic factors. Bulk and rhizosphere soils host distinct bacterial communities that differentially vary along the chronosequence. Cation exchange capacity, exchangeable potassium, and metabolite concentration in the soil account for the rhizosphere bacterial diversity. Although the soil fraction (bulk soil and rhizosphere) explains up to 17.2% of the variation in bacterial microbiota, the soil developmental stage explains up to 47.7% of this variation. In addition, the operational taxonomic unit (OTU) co-occurrence network of the rhizosphere, whose complexity increases along the chronosequence, is loosely structured in barren compared with mature soils, corroborating our hypothesis that soil development tunes the rhizosphere effect.

Indexed as

RhizosphereSoil MicrobiologyArctic RegionsBacteriaBiodiversityDesert ClimateIce CoverMicrobiotaPlant RootsSoilSoil

Identifiers

PMID29335640
PMCPMC5931989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.