Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29335532›Full record

ArticleNature communications2018

Intelligent image-based in situ single-cell isolation.

Csilla Brasko, Kevin Smith, Csaba Molnar, Nora Farago, Lili Hegedus, Arpad Balind, Tamas Balassa, Abel Szkalisity, Farkas Sukosd, Katalin Kocsis and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
12.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 95 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Csilla BraskoUniversity of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary Közép fasor 52, 6726, Szeged, Hungary.
Kevin SmithSchool of Computer Science and Communication, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Lindstedtsvägen 3-5, 10044, Stockholm, Sweden.
Csaba MolnarBiological Research Centre of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Temesvári krt. 62., 6726, Szeged, Hungary.
Nora FaragoUniversity of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary Közép fasor 52, 6726, Szeged, Hungary.
Lili HegedusBiological Research Centre of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Temesvári krt. 62., 6726, Szeged, Hungary.
Arpad BalindBiological Research Centre of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Temesvári krt. 62., 6726, Szeged, Hungary.
Tamas BalassaBiological Research Centre of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Temesvári krt. 62., 6726, Szeged, Hungary.
Abel SzkalisityBiological Research Centre of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Temesvári krt. 62., 6726, Szeged, Hungary.
Farkas SukosdUniversity of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary Közép fasor 52, 6726, Szeged, Hungary.
Katalin KocsisUniversity of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary Közép fasor 52, 6726, Szeged, Hungary.
Balazs BalintSeqOmics Biotechnology Ltd, Vállalkozók útja 7, 6782, Mórahalom, Hungary.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5102-0787
Lassi PaavolainenInstitute for Molecular Medicine Finland (FIMM), University of Helsinki, Tukholmankatu 8, Helsinki, 00014, Finland.
Marton Z EnyediBiological Research Centre of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Temesvári krt. 62., 6726, Szeged, Hungary.
Istvan NagyBiological Research Centre of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Temesvári krt. 62., 6726, Szeged, Hungary.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2528-9173
Laszlo G PuskasBiological Research Centre of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Temesvári krt. 62., 6726, Szeged, Hungary.
Lajos HaracskaBiological Research Centre of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Temesvári krt. 62., 6726, Szeged, Hungary.
Gabor TamasUniversity of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary Közép fasor 52, 6726, Szeged, Hungary.
Peter HorvathBiological Research Centre of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Temesvári krt. 62., 6726, Szeged, Hungary. horvath.peter@brc.mta.hu.
HUN-REN Szegedi Biológiai Kutatóközpont · HUUniversity of Szeged · HUScience for Life Laboratory · SESeqOmics Biotechnology (Hungary) · HUUniversity of Helsinki · FI

Funding

European Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quantifying heterogeneities within cell populations is important for many fields including cancer research and neurobiology; however, techniques to isolate individual cells are limited. Here, we describe a high-throughput, non-disruptive, and cost-effective isolation method that is capable of capturing individually targeted cells using widely available techniques. Using high-resolution microscopy, laser microcapture microscopy, image analysis, and machine learning, our technology enables scalable molecular genetic analysis of single cells, targetable by morphology or location within the sample.

Indexed as

AnimalsCells, CulturedCell SeparationGene Expression ProfilingHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMachine LearningMicroscopy, ConfocalPyramidal CellsReproducibility of ResultsSingle-Cell Analysis

Identifiers

PMID29335532
PMCPMC5768687
OpenAlexW2783079483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.