Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29335516›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

An evaluation of the effect of pulse-shape on grey and white matter stimulation in the rat brain.

Marjolijn Deprez, Kelly Luyck, Laura Luyten, Tim Tambuyzer, Bart Nuttin, Myles Mc Laughlin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Marjolijn DeprezExperimental Neurosurgery and Neuroanatomy, Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, B-3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Kelly LuyckExperimental Neurosurgery and Neuroanatomy, Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, B-3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Laura LuytenCentre for Psychology of Learning and Experimental Psychopathology, Department of Psychology, KU Leuven, B-3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Tim TambuyzerDivision Animal and Human Health Engineering, Department of Biosystems, KU Leuven, B-3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Bart NuttinExperimental Neurosurgery and Neuroanatomy, Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, B-3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Myles Mc LaughlinExpORL, Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, B-3000, Leuven, Belgium. myles.mclaughlin@kuleuven.be.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the current success of neuromodulation, standard biphasic, rectangular pulse shapes may not be optimal to achieve symptom alleviation. Here, we compared stimulation efficiency (in terms of charge) between complex and standard pulses in two areas of the rat brain. In motor cortex, Gaussian and interphase gap stimulation (IPG) increased stimulation efficiency in terms of charge per phase compared with a standard pulse. Moreover, IPG stimulation of the deep mesencephalic reticular formation in freely moving rats was more efficient compared to a standard pulse. We therefore conclude that complex pulses are superior to standard stimulation, as less charge is required to achieve the same behavioral effects in a motor paradigm. These results have important implications for the understanding of electrical stimulation of the nervous system and open new perspectives for the design of the next generation of safe and efficient neural implants.

Indexed as

MotionAnimalsElectric StimulationGray MatterRatsWhite Matter

Identifiers

PMID29335516
PMCPMC5768709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.