Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29335492›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2018

Assessing the effectiveness of NICE criteria for stratifying breast cancer risk in a UK cohort.

Lucy A Littlejohn, Jim Gibbs, Lee B Jordan, Zosia H Miedzybrodzka, Christine Bell, David Goudie, Jacqueline Dunlop, Jonathan N Berg

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lucy A LittlejohnClinical Genetics, University of Dundee, Dundee, Angus, UK. lucy_littlejohn@outlook.com.
Jim GibbsDepartment of Pathology, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, Angus, UK.
Lee B JordanDepartment of Pathology, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, Angus, UK.
Zosia H MiedzybrodzkaDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Ashgrove House, Aberdeen, UK.
Christine BellDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Ashgrove House, Aberdeen, UK.
David GoudieDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, Angus, UK.
Jacqueline DunlopDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, Angus, UK.
Jonathan N BergClinical Genetics, University of Dundee, Dundee, Angus, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer risk is a common indication for referral to clinical genetics services. UK National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines use family history (FH) to stratify by 10-year risk of breast cancer from age 40. Patients are stratified into population risk (PR, 10-year risk <3%), moderate (MR, 3-8%) and high risk (HR, >8%). Women at increased risk are offered screening at or prior to age 40. To assess the clinical effectiveness of current risk stratification, FH data were obtained for all unaffected women with a FH of breast cancer aged <50, referred to cancer genetics from 2000-2010. Patients were risk stratified by NICE criteria, identifying patients who subsequently developed breast cancer. A total of 1409 women had 15,414 patient years of follow-up. Thirty invasive breast cancers developed, 13 in MR and 13 in HR women. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated no significant difference in the rate of breast cancer development between PR and MR women from ages 40 to 49 (Log rank p = 0.431). There was a significant difference between ages 40 and 49 years between PR and HR women (p = 0.036), but not on exclusion of BRCA mutation carriers (p = 0.136). NICE absolute 10-year risk thresholds between ages 40 and 49 were not met in any risk group, when risk was estimated using the guidelines (PR = 0.82%, MR = 1.68%, HR = 3.56%). Our data suggest that improved criteria are required for risk assessment prior to age 50 and screening resources may be best focussed on those with highly penetrant mutations in cancer risk genes.

Indexed as

Practice Guidelines as TopicAdultBRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinBreast NeoplasmsFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenetic TestingHumansMiddle AgedPenetranceUnited KingdomBRCA1 ProteinBRCA1 protein, humanBRCA2 ProteinBRCA2 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID29335492
PMCPMC5891489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.