Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29335485›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Electron beam melting in the fabrication of three-dimensional mesh titanium mandibular prosthesis scaffold.

Rongzeng Yan, Danmei Luo, Haitao Huang, Runxin Li, Niu Yu, Changkui Liu, Min Hu, Qiguo Rong

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Alveolar Bone Regeneration: Smart Biomaterials and Physical Stimulation.Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Regenerative biomaterials · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Additive manufacturing of bone scaffolds.International journal of bioprinting · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Rongzeng YanDepartment of Stomatology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100871, China.
Danmei LuoDepartment of Mechanics and Engineering science, College of Engineering, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China.
Haitao HuangDepartment of Stomatology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100871, China.
Runxin LiDepartment of Stomatology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100871, China.
Niu YuOral and Maxillofacial Surgery department of General Hospital of Liao he Oilfield, Panjin, 124000, Liaoning, China.
Changkui LiuDepartment of Stomatology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100871, China.
Min HuDepartment of Stomatology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100871, China. humin48@vip.163.com.
Qiguo RongDepartment of Mechanics and Engineering science, College of Engineering, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China. qrong@pku.edu.cn.
Chinese PLA General Hospital · CNPeking University · CNSecond Hospital of Liaohe Oilfield · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study was designed to fulfill effective work-flow to fabricate three-dimensional mesh titanium scaffold for mandibular reconstruction. The 3D titanium mesh scaffold was designed based on a volunteer with whole mandible defect. (1) acquisition of the CT data; (2) design with computer aided design (CAD) and finite element analysis (FEA). The pore size and intervals with the best mechanic strength was also calculated using FEA. (3) fabrication of the scaffold using electron beam melting (EBM); (4) implantation surgery. The case recovered well, without loosening and rejection. Additionally, 12 mandibular defect model beagles were used to verify the results. The model was established via tooth extraction and mandibular resection surgeries, and the scaffold was designed individually based on CT data obtained at 2 weeks after extraction operation. Then scaffolds were fabricated using 3D EBM, and the implantation surgery was performed at 2 months after extraction operation. All the animals healed well after implantation, and the grafted mandibular recovered well with time. The relevant parameters of the grafted mandibular were nearly to the native mandibular at postoperative 12 months. It is feasible to fabricate mesh titanium scaffold for repairing mandibular defects individually using reverse engineering, CAD and EBM techniques.

Indexed as

Computer-Aided DesignFreezingMandibular ProsthesisProsthesis DesignTitaniumAnimalsDogsElectronsMandibular ReconstructionMechanical PhenomenaTomography, X-Ray ComputedTitanium

Identifiers

PMID29335485
PMCPMC5768757
OpenAlexW2783979870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.