ArticleThe Journal of invasive cardiology2018
Predictors of Hemodynamic Improvement and Stabilization Following Intraaortic Balloon Pump Implantation in Patients With Advanced Heart Failure.
Article in The Journal of invasive cardiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Risk factors and predictive model for mortality in acute myocardial infarction with ventricular septal rupture at high altitudes.World journal of cardiology · 2025Article
- Bridge to Life: Current Landscape of Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support in Heart-Failure-Related Cardiogenic Shock.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- The Intra-aortic Balloon Pump: A Focused Review of Physiology, Transport Logistics, Mechanics, and Complications.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2024Review
- The management of heart failure cardiogenic shock: an international RAND appropriateness panel.Critical care (London, England) · 2024Article
- Contemporary approach to cardiogenic shock care: a state-of-the-art review.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Review
- To Balloon or Not to Balloon? The Effects of an Intra-Aortic Balloon-Pump on Coronary Artery Flow during Extracorporeal Circulation Simulating Normal and Low Cardiac Output Syndromes.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
- ANMCO POSITION PAPER: Role of intra-aortic balloon pump in patients with acute advanced heart failure and cardiogenic shock.European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology · 2021Article
- Mechanical Support in Early Cardiogenic Shock: What Is the Role of Intra-aortic Balloon Counterpulsation?Current heart failure reports · 2020Review
- Intra-aortic balloon pump: is the tide turning?Critical care (London, England) · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThe intraaortic balloon pump (IABP) is currently an essential tool to improve hemodynamics in patients with advanced heart failure (HF). This study investigated predictors for hemodynamic improvement or stabilization with IABP therapy in patients with advanced HF.
methodsPatients with advanced HF and hemodynamic deterioration treated with IABP were enrolled in this retrospective study. Invasive hemodynamics were measured before IABP implantation and 2 weeks after IABP initiation. Significant degree of hemodynamic improvement was defined as 30% improvement in all three of the following variables: central venous pressure (CVP); pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP); and cardiac index (CI). Hemodynamic stabilization was counted in patients reaching CVP <12 mm Hg, PCWP <18 mm Hg, and CI >2.0 L/min/m² or CI >2.2 L/min/m² on inotropes.
resultsNinety-one patients (55 ± 12 years; 78% males) were evaluated. Seventeen patients (18.7%) achieved significant hemodynamic improvement, and baseline CVP >16 mm Hg was associated with this endpoint (P<.05). Thirty-two patients (35.2%) achieved hemodynamic stabilization; lower baseline heart rate (HR) and PCWP were associated with this stabilization (P<.05). Patients with HR <92 beats/min and PCWP <25 mm Hg achieved hemodynamic stabilization more frequently than those without HR <92 beats/min and PCWP <25 mm Hg (66.7% vs 19.7%; P<.05).
conclusionElevated CVP and lower HR and PCWP before IABP initiation help predict high response to IABP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29335384PMC5862635W2986712805What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.