Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29335327›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2018

GPs' experiences of diagnosing and managing childhood eczema: a qualitative study in primary care.

Emma Le Roux, Kingsley Powell, Jonathan P Banks, Mathew J Ridd

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Patterns and trends in eczema management in UK primary care (2009-2018): A population-based cohort study.Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. The content and conduct of GP consultations for dermatology problems: a cross-sectional study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Emma Le RouxCentre for Academic Primary Care, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol.
Kingsley PowellCentre for Academic Primary Care, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol.
Jonathan P BanksNational Institute for Health Research Collaborations for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care West (NIHR CLAHRC West), University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK.
Mathew J RiddCentre for Academic Primary Care, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol.

Funding

Department of Health PDF-2014-07-013
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEczema is common among children, and in the UK the majority are managed by GPs. The most common cause of poor disease control is incorrect use of topical treatments. There is a lack of research into the challenges faced by GPs in diagnosing and managing this condition.

aimTo explore the experiences of GPs in assessing and managing children with eczema. DESIGN AND

settingQualitative study in primary care in England.

methodSemi-structured interviews with 15 GPs were audiorecorded, transcribed verbatim, and analysed thematically using the framework method.

resultsGPs described a paucity of dermatology training. Although most GPs were confident diagnosing uncomplicated eczema, they reported using a trial-and-error approach to prescribing emollients, and were uncertain about quantities of topical treatments to issue. Mild and moderate potency topical corticosteroids (TCS) were commonly used, but most GPs lacked confidence in recommending potent TCS, and viewed parents or carers to be fearful of using all strengths of TCS. GPs perceived adherence to treatments to be low, but provision of information to support self-care was variable. Routine review of medication use or disease control was uncommon, which GPs attributed to service constraints. Participants' views on the causes and management of eczema were perceived to be at odds with parents and carers, who were said to be overly focused on an underlying cause, such as allergy.

conclusionGP uncertainty in managing eczema, lack of routine information and review, and perceived dissonance with parents around causation and management may be contributing to low concordance with treatments.

Indexed as

Primary Health CareAdrenal Cortex HormonesAttitude of Health PersonnelChild HealthDermatologyEczemaEmollientsGeneral PractitionersHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansParentsPractice Patterns, Physicians'Professional-Family RelationsQualitative ResearchUnited KingdomAdrenal Cortex HormonesEmollientsatopic eczema/dermatitiseczemapaediatricsprimary health carequalitative research

Identifiers

PMID29335327
PMCPMC5774966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.