Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29335323›Full record

Observational studyThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2018

Antibiotic prescribing quality for children in primary care: an observational study.

Megan Rose Williams, Giles Greene, Gurudutt Naik, Kathryn Hughes, Christopher C Butler, Alastair D Hay

Open access · bronzeAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Digital interventions for parents of acutely ill children and their treatment-seeking behaviour: a systematic review.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Increasing paediatric prescribing rates in British Columbian children: cause for concern?Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Megan Rose WilliamsSchool of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff.
Giles GreeneDepartment of Population Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff.
Gurudutt NaikDepartment of Population Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff.
Kathryn HughesPRIME Centre Wales, Department of Population Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff.
Christopher C ButlerNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford.
Alastair D HayCentre for Academic Primary Care, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Bristol.
At Bristol · GBCardiff University · GBUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

Department of Health 08/66/01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOveruse and inappropriate prescribing of antibiotics is driving antibiotic resistance. GPs often prescribe antibiotics for upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs) in young children despite their marginal beneficial effects.

aimTo assess the quality of antibiotic prescribing for common infections in young children attending primary care and to investigate influencing factors. DESIGN AND

settingAn observational, descriptive analysis, including children attending primary care sites in England and Wales.

methodThe Diagnosis of Urinary Tract infection in Young children study collected data on 7163 children aged <5 years, presenting to UK primary care with an acute illness (<28 days). Data were compared with the European Surveillance of Antimicrobial Consumption Network (ESAC-Net) disease-specific quality indicators to assess prescribing for URTIs, tonsillitis, and otitis media, against ESAC-Net proposed standards. Non-parametric trend tests and χ

resultsPrescribing rates fell within the recommendations for URTIs but exceeded the recommended limits for tonsillitis and otitis media. The proportion of children receiving the recommended antibiotic was below standards for URTIs and tonsillitis, but within the recommended limits for otitis media. Prescribing rates increased as the level of deprivation decreased for all infections (

conclusionThe quality of antibiotic prescribing in this study was mixed and highlights the scope for future improvements. There is a need to assess further the quality of disease-specific antibiotic prescribing in UK primary care settings using data representative of routine clinical practice.

Indexed as

Primary Health CareAnti-Bacterial AgentsChildChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesDrug PrescriptionsDrug Resistance, MicrobialEnglandGuideline AdherenceHumansInappropriate PrescribingInfantPractice Guidelines as TopicPractice Patterns, Physicians'Prospective StudiesRespiratory Tract InfectionsAnti-Bacterial Agentsantibiotic prescribingchildrenESAC-Net disease-specific quality indicatorsprimary carerespiratory tract infections

Identifiers

PMID29335323
PMCPMC5774968
OpenAlexW2782618754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.