Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29335233›Full record

ArticleJMIR cancer2018

Internet-Based Group Intervention for Ovarian Cancer Survivors: Feasibility and Preliminary Results.

Ellen M Kinner, Jessica S Armer, Bonnie A McGregor, Jennifer Duffecy, Susan Leighton, Marya E Corden, Janine Gauthier Mullady, Frank J Penedo, Susan K Lutgendorf

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. The efficacy of web or mobile-based interventions to alleviate emotional symptoms in people with advanced cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. The relationship between mobile health app use, eHealth literacy, and psychological well-being in women with gynecological cancer: a descriptive correlational study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ellen M KinnerDepartment of Psychological & Brain Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9967-830X
Jessica S ArmerDepartment of Psychological & Brain Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8499-7589
Bonnie A McGregorOrion Center for Integrative Medicine, Seattle, WA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0531-9347
Jennifer DuffecyDepartment of Clinical Psychiatry and Center on Depression and Resilience, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4505-6820
Susan LeightonOvarian Cancer Research Fund Alliance, Washington, DC, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5944-8040
Marya E CordenDepartment of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8199-004X
Janine Gauthier MulladyLife Reset Solutions, Chicago, IL, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9099-2407
Frank J PenedoDepartment of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2422-2391
Susan K LutgendorfDepartment of Psychological & Brain Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3793-5881

Funding

Viral VectorP30CA086862 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI Douglas Robert Spitz · 2000 to 2026
$70.0M
Mechanisms of Health and Disease at the Behavioral-Biomedical InterfaceT32GM108540 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI LUTGENDORF, SUSAN K, VOSS, MICHELLE WEBB · 2014 to 2023
$1.7M
Development of a Web-Based Group Intervention to Support Ovarian Cancer SurvivorsR03CA184306 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI LUTGENDORF, SUSAN K · 2015 to 2016
$172k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA086862NCI NIH HHS R03 CA184306NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM108540
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDevelopment of psychosocial group interventions for ovarian cancer survivors has been limited. Drawing from elements of cognitive-behavioral stress management (CBSM), mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR), and acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT), we developed and conducted preliminary testing of an Internet-based group intervention tailored specifically to meet the needs of ovarian cancer survivors. The Internet-based platform facilitated home delivery of the psychosocial intervention to a group of cancer survivors for whom attending face-to-face programs could be difficult given their physical limitations and the small number of ovarian cancer survivors at any one treatment site.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to develop, optimize, and assess the usability, acceptability, feasibility, and preliminary intended effects of an Internet-based group stress management intervention for ovarian cancer survivors delivered via a tablet or laptop.

methodsIn total, 9 ovarian cancer survivors provided feedback during usability testing. Subsequently, 19 survivors participated in 5 waves of field testing of the 10-week group intervention led by 2 psychologists. The group met weekly for 2 hours via an Internet-based videoconference platform. Structured interviews and weekly evaluations were used to elicit feedback on the website and intervention content. Before and after the intervention, measures of mood, quality of life (QOL), perceived stress, sleep, and social support were administered. Paired t tests were used to examine changes in psychosocial measures over time.

resultsUsability results indicated that participants (n=9) performed basic tablet functions quickly with no errors and performed website functions easily with a low frequency of errors. In the field trial (n=19), across 5 groups, the 10-week intervention was well attended. Perceived stress (P=.03) and ovarian cancer-specific QOL (P=.01) both improved significantly during the course of the intervention. Trends toward decreased distress (P=.18) and greater physical (P=.05) and functional well-being (P=.06) were also observed. Qualitative interviews revealed that the most common obstacles participants experienced were technical issues and the time commitment for practicing the techniques taught in the program. Participants reported that the intervention helped them to overcome a sense of isolation and that they appreciated the ability to participate at home.

conclusionsAn Internet-based group intervention tailored specifically for ovarian cancer survivors is highly usable and acceptable with moderate levels of feasibility. Preliminary psychosocial outcomes indicate decreases in perceived stress and improvements in ovarian cancer-specific QOL following the intervention. A randomized clinical trial is needed to demonstrate the efficacy of this promising intervention for ovarian cancer survivors.

Indexed as

eHealthfeasibility studiesovarian cancerpsychological stressquality of life

Identifiers

PMID29335233
PMCPMC5789163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.