Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29335022›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical semantics2018

Tackling the challenges of matching biomedical ontologies.

Daniel Faria, Catia Pesquita, Isabela Mott, Catarina Martins, Francisco M Couto, Isabel F Cruz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical semantics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The Immunopeptidomics Ontology (ImPO).Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. FOntCell: Fusion of Ontologies of Cells.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Daniel FariaInstituto Gulbenkian de Ciência, R Quinta Grande 6, Oeiras, Portugal. dfaria@igc.gulbenkian.pt.ORCID 0000-0003-1511-277X
Catia PesquitaLASIGE, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, Campo Grande, Lisboa, Portugal.
Isabela MottLASIGE, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, Campo Grande, Lisboa, Portugal.
Catarina MartinsSchool of Computer Science, University of Manchester, Oxford Rd, Manchester, UK.
Francisco M CoutoLASIGE, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, Campo Grande, Lisboa, Portugal.
Isabel F CruzADVIS Lab, Department of Computer Science, University of Illinois at Chicago, 851 S. Morgan St., Chicago, Illinois, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBiomedical ontologies pose several challenges to ontology matching due both to the complexity of the biomedical domain and to the characteristics of the ontologies themselves. The biomedical tracks in the Ontology Matching Evaluation Initiative (OAEI) have spurred the development of matching systems able to tackle these challenges, and benchmarked their general performance. In this study, we dissect the strategies employed by matching systems to tackle the challenges of matching biomedical ontologies and gauge the impact of the challenges themselves on matching performance, using the AgreementMakerLight (AML) system as the platform for this study.

resultsWe demonstrate that the linear complexity of the hash-based searching strategy implemented by most state-of-the-art ontology matching systems is essential for matching large biomedical ontologies efficiently. We show that accounting for all lexical annotations (e.g., labels and synonyms) in biomedical ontologies leads to a substantial improvement in F-measure over using only the primary name, and that accounting for the reliability of different types of annotations generally also leads to a marked improvement. Finally, we show that cross-references are a reliable source of information and that, when using biomedical ontologies as background knowledge, it is generally more reliable to use them as mediators than to perform lexical expansion.

conclusionsWe anticipate that translating traditional matching algorithms to the hash-based searching paradigm will be a critical direction for the future development of the field. Improving the evaluation carried out in the biomedical tracks of the OAEI will also be important, as without proper reference alignments there is only so much that can be ascertained about matching systems or strategies. Nevertheless, it is clear that, to tackle the various challenges posed by biomedical ontologies, ontology matching systems must be able to efficiently combine multiple strategies into a mature matching approach.

Indexed as

Biological OntologiesAlgorithmsSemanticsBiomedical ontologiesOntology matching

Identifiers

PMID29335022
PMCPMC5769431

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.