ArticleBMC bioinformatics2018
Protein-protein interface hot spots prediction based on a hybrid feature selection strategy.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances in protein-protein interaction prediction: a deep learning perspective.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2025Review
- PPI-hotspoteLife · 2024Article
- PCSK9 inhibitor effectively alleviated cognitive dysfunction in a type 2 diabetes mellitus rat model.PeerJ · 2024Article
- Interface engineering of cellobiose dehydrogenase improves interdomain electron transfer.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2023Article
- Prediction of hot spots towards drug discovery by protein sequence embedding with 1D convolutional neural network.PloS one · 2023Article
- Insights into Rational Design of a New Class of Allosteric Effectors with Molecular Dynamics Markov State Models and Network Theory.ACS omega · 2022Article
- Data analysis methods for defining biomarkers from omics data.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2022Review
- A GHKNN model based on the physicochemical property extraction method to identify SNARE proteins.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- m5CPred-SVM: a novel method for predicting m5C sites of RNA.BMC bioinformatics · 2020Article
- SPOTONE: Hot Spots on Protein Complexes with Extremely Randomized Trees via Sequence-Only Features.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Article
- Prediction of hot spots in protein-DNA binding interfaces based on supervised isometric feature mapping and extreme gradient boosting.BMC bioinformatics · 2020Article
- iPNHOT: a knowledge-based approach for identifying protein-nucleic acid interaction hot spots.BMC bioinformatics · 2020Article
- Article
- Spectral analysis of molecular dynamics simulations on PDZ: MD sectors.Journal of biomolecular structure & dynamics · 2020Article
- Predicting ATP-Binding Cassette Transporters Using the Random Forest Method.Frontiers in genetics · 2020Article
- A Method for Prediction of Thermophilic Protein Based on Reduced Amino Acids and Mixed Features.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020Article
- Identification of Human Enzymes Using Amino Acid Composition and the Composition ofBioMed research international · 2020Article
- Extremely-randomized-tree-based Prediction of NCurrent genomics · 2020Article
- Prediction of Anticancer Peptides Using a Low-Dimensional Feature Model.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020Article
- A Coarse-Grained Methodology Identifies Intrinsic Mechanisms That Dissociate Interacting Protein Pairs.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHot spots are interface residues that contribute most binding affinity to protein-protein interaction. A compact and relevant feature subset is important for building machine learning methods to predict hot spots on protein-protein interfaces. Although different methods have been used to detect the relevant feature subset from a variety of features related to interface residues, it is still a challenge to detect the optimal feature subset for building the final model.
resultsIn this study, three different feature selection methods were compared to propose a new hybrid feature selection strategy. This new strategy was proved to effectively reduce the feature space when we were building the prediction models for identifying hotspot residues. It was tested on eighty-two features, both conventional and newly proposed. According to the strategy, combining the feature subsets selected by decision tree and mRMR (maximum Relevance Minimum Redundancy) individually, we were able to build a model with 6 features by using a PSFS (Pseudo Sequential Forward Selection) process. Compared with other state-of-art methods for the independent test set, our model had shown better or comparable predictive performances (with F-measure 0.622 and recall 0.821). Analysis of the 6 features confirmed that our newly proposed feature CNSV_REL1 was important for our model. The analysis also showed that the complementarity between features should be considered as an important aspect when conducting the feature selection.
conclusionIn this study, most important of all, a new strategy for feature selection was proposed and proved to be effective in selecting the optimal feature subset for building prediction models, which can be used to predict hot spot residues on protein-protein interfaces. Moreover, two aspects, the generalization of the single feature and the complementarity between features, were proved to be of great importance and should be considered in feature selection methods. Finally, our newly proposed feature CNSV_REL1 had been proved an alternative and effective feature in predicting hot spots by our study. Our model is available for users through a webserver: http://zhulab.ahu.edu.cn/iPPHOT/ .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.