Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29334861›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of primary health care2018

COPD management by Swedish general practitioners - baseline results of the PRIMAIR study.

Hanna Sandelowsky, Natalia Natalishvili, Ingvar Krakau, Sonja Modin, Björn Ställberg, Anna Nager

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of primary health care, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Educational Processes for Health and Disease Self-Management in Public Health: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Psychosocial issues need more attention in COPD self-management education.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hanna Sandelowskya NVS, Section for Family Medicine and Primary Care , Karolinska Institutet , Stockholm , Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1721-6540
Natalia Natalishvilic Bergshamra Ulriksdal Health Care Center , Stockholm , Sweden.
Ingvar Krakaua NVS, Section for Family Medicine and Primary Care , Karolinska Institutet , Stockholm , Sweden.
Sonja Modina NVS, Section for Family Medicine and Primary Care , Karolinska Institutet , Stockholm , Sweden.
Björn Ställberge Department of Public Health and Caring Science, Family Medicine and Preventive medicine , Uppsala University , Uppsala , Sweden.
Anna Nagera NVS, Section for Family Medicine and Primary Care , Karolinska Institutet , Stockholm , Sweden.
Karolinska Institutet · SEStockholm County Council · SEUppsala University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a common cause of suffering and death. Evidence-based management of COPD by general practitioners (GPs) is crucial for decreasing the impact of the disease. Efficient strategies include early diagnosis, smoking cessation and multimodal treatment.

aimTo describe knowledge about and skills for managing COPD in GPs in Sweden.

methodsPrior to COPD education (the PRIMAIR Study), GPs at primary health care centers (PHCCs) in Stockholm replied to 13 written, patient-case based, multiple choice and free-text questions about COPD. Their knowledge and practical management skills were assessed by assigned points that were analyzed with non-parametric tests.

resultsOverall, 250 GPs at 34 PHCCs replied (89% response rate). Total mean score was 9.9 (maximum 26). Scores were highest on 'management of smoking cessation', 'follow-up after exacerbation' and 'diagnostic procedures'. Spirometry was used frequently, although interpretation skills were suboptimal. 'Management of maintenance therapy', 'management of multimorbidity' and 'interprofessional cooperation' had mediocre scores. Scores were unrelated to whether there was a nurse-led asthma/COPD clinic at the PHCC.

conclusionsSwedish GPs' knowledge of COPD and adherence to current guidelines seem insufficient. A nurse-led asthma/COPD clinic at the PHCC does not correlate with sufficient COPD skills in the GPs. The relevance of this study to participants' actual clinical practice and usefulness of easy-to-access clinical guides are interesting topics for future investigation. To identify problem areas, we suggest using questionnaires prior to educational interventions. Key Points General practitioners (GPs) play a crucial role in providing evidence-based care for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who are treated in primary care. Swedish GPs' knowledge about COPD and adherence to current guidelines seem insufficient. Areas in greatest need of improvement are spirometry interpretation, management of maintenance therapy, management of multimorbidity in patients with COPD and interprofessional cooperation.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceDisease ManagementGeneral PracticeGeneral PractitionersGuideline AdherencePrimary Health CareAdultAgedAsthmaComorbidityFemaleHumansInterprofessional RelationsMaleMiddle AgedNursescase method leaningchronic diseasesContinuous medical educationCOPDprimary careprimary care physiciansprofessional trainingtraditional lectures

Identifiers

PMID29334861
PMCPMC5901441
OpenAlexW2784108576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.