Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29334775›Full record

Trial reportJournal of diabetes science and technology2018

Resistance to Acetaminophen Interference in a Novel Continuous Glucose Monitoring System.

Peter Calhoun, Terri Kang Johnson, Jonathan Hughes, David Price, Andrew K Balo

Abstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of diabetes science and technology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Interferences With CGM Systems: Practical Relevance?Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2022
    Article
  12. Making sense of glucose sensors in end-stage kidney disease: A review.Frontiers in clinical diabetes and healthcare · 2022
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Continuous Glucose Monitoring in the Hospital.Endocrinology and metabolism (Seoul, Korea) · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Peter Calhoun1 Dexcom, Inc, San Diego, CA, USA.
Terri Kang Johnson1 Dexcom, Inc, San Diego, CA, USA.
Jonathan Hughes1 Dexcom, Inc, San Diego, CA, USA.
David Price1 Dexcom, Inc, San Diego, CA, USA.
Andrew K Balo1 Dexcom, Inc, San Diego, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acetaminophen (APAP) can cause erroneously high readings in real-time continuous glucose monitoring (rtCGM) systems. APAP-associated bias in an investigational rtCGM system (G6) was evaluated by taking the difference in glucose measurements between rtCGM and YSI from 1 hour before to 6 hours after a 1-g oral APAP dose in 66 subjects with type 1 or type 2 diabetes. The interference effect was defined as the average post-dose (30-90 minutes) bias minus the average baseline bias for each subject. The clinically meaningful interference effect was defined as 10 mg/dL. The G6 system's overall mean (±SD) interference effect was 3.1 ± 4.8 mg/dL (one-sided upper 95% CI = 4.1 mg/dL), significantly lower than 10 mg/dL. The G6 system's resistance to APAP interference should provide reassurance to those using the drug.

Indexed as

ArtifactsBlood Glucose Self-MonitoringAcetaminophenAdolescentAdultAgedBlood GlucoseDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedYoung AdultAcetaminophenBlood Glucoseaccuracyacetaminophencontinuous glucose monitoringdrug interferencesensor performance

Identifiers

PMID29334775
PMCPMC5851234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.