Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29334344›Full record

ArticleTopics in stroke rehabilitation2018

Content validity and satisfaction with a caregiver-integrated web-based rehabilitation intervention for persons with stroke.

Sarah Blanton, Sandra Dunbar, Patricia C Clark

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Topics in stroke rehabilitation, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Family-Centered Care During Constraint-Induced Therapy After Chronic Stroke: A Feasibility Study.Rehabilitation nursing : the official journal of the Association of Rehabilitation Nurses
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah Blantona Division of Physical Therapy, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, School of Medicine , Emory University , Atlanta , GA , USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0137-1925
Sandra Dunbarb Nell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing , Emory University , Atlanta , GA , USA.
Patricia C Clarkc Byrdine F. Lewis School of Nursing , Georgia State University , Atlanta , GA , USA.
Emory University · USGeorgia State University · US

Funding

Atlanta Clinical and Translational Science Institute (ACTSI) RenewalUL1TR000454 · NCATS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI STEPHENS, DAVID S · 2012 to 2016
$25.8M
Enhancing Scientific Inquiry in Clinical Neurosciences Through Methodology TrainiR25NS088248 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI COFFEY, CHRISTOPHER S., GUTMANN, LAURIE · 2014 to 2018
$2.3M
Evaluation of a Carepartner-Integrated Telehealth Rehabilitation Program for Persons with Stroke - NICHD K-23K23HD080837 · NICHD · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI BLANTON, SARAH R. · 2015 to 2018
$542k
American Heart Association-American Stroke Association 14CRP18730037NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000454NICHD NIH HHS K23 HD080837NINDS NIH HHS R25 NS088248
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Family members provide valuable contributions during rehabilitation after stroke, but frequently report higher incidences of burden, depression, and social isolation during caregiving. Thus, effective interventions to reduce stroke impact on the family are needed. Objectives To evaluate the content validity and satisfaction of a caregiver-focused web-based intervention designed to improve stroke survivor physical function while reducing caregiver negative outcomes. Methods Caregivers of individuals with stroke (N = 6) and expert rehabilitation researchers (N = 4) were presented with a novel, web-based intervention (CARE-CITE) designed to foster problem-solving and skill-building while facilitating caregiver involvement during constraint-induced movement therapy. Caregivers rated CARE-CITE for usefulness, ease of use, acceptability, and time to complete. Rehabilitation experts evaluated content for accuracy, feasibility, acceptability, problem relevance and ease of use. Ratings were assessed using a five-point Likert-type response scales (1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree). Results On average, all caregivers agreed or strongly agreed that the modules were useful (4.42), easy to use (4.60), and acceptable (4.41). Mean total satisfaction score was 4.45, and average review time was 15 min per module. Expert reviewers agreed or strongly agreed that each module was accurate (4.95), feasible (4.8), easy to use (4.86), acceptable (4.96), and had appropriate problem relevance (4.65). Conclusions The CARE-CITE intervention may be a viable program for caregivers of patients with stroke. Currently a pilot study is underway to evaluate the impact of the intervention on caregiver mental health, family conflict around stroke recovery and stroke survivor upper extremity function.

Indexed as

InternetOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CareAdultCaregiversFamilyHumansStroke RehabilitationCARE-CITE: Carepartner and Constraint-Induced TherapycaregiverCIMT: Constraint-induced movement therapyconstraint-induced movement therapyfamilyself-managementStroketelehealthupper extremity

Identifiers

PMID29334344
PMCPMC5876148
OpenAlexW2782750714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.