Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29334333›Full record

ArticleGlobal health action2018

Are people at high risk for diabetes visiting health facility for confirmation of diagnosis? A population-based study from rural India.

Nikhil Srinivasapura Venkateshmurthy, Kathirvel Soundappan, Balaji Gummidi, Malipeddi Bhaskara Rao, Nikhil Tandon, K Srinath Reddy, Dorairaj Prabhakaran, Sailesh Mohan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global health action, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Nikhil Srinivasapura Venkateshmurthya Public Health Foundation of India , Gurgaon , India.ORCID 0000-0003-4037-6371
Kathirvel Soundappanb Department of Community Medicine, School of Public Health , Post Graduate Institute for Medical Education and Research , Chandigarh , India.
Balaji Gummidia Public Health Foundation of India , Gurgaon , India.
Malipeddi Bhaskara Raoc MyCure Hospitals , Visakhapatnam , India.
Nikhil Tandond Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism , All India Institute of Medical Sciences , New Delhi , India.
K Srinath Reddya Public Health Foundation of India , Gurgaon , India.
Dorairaj Prabhakarana Public Health Foundation of India , Gurgaon , India.
Sailesh Mohana Public Health Foundation of India , Gurgaon , India.
Public Health Foundation of India · INAll India Institute of Medical Sciences · INCentre for Chronic Disease Control · INMaxCure Hospitals · INPost Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIndia is witnessing a rising burden of type 2 diabetes mellitus. India's National Programme for Prevention and Control of Diabetes, Cancer, Cardiovascular diseases and Stroke recommends population-based screening and referral to primary health centre for diagnosis confirmation and treatment initiation. However, little is known about uptake of confirmatory tests among screen positives.

objectiveTo estimate the uptake of confirmatory tests and identify the reasons for not undergoing confirmation by those at high risk for developing diabetes.

methodsWe analysed data collected under project UDAY, a comprehensive diabetes and hypertension prevention and management programme, being implemented in rural Andhra Pradesh, India. Under UDAY, population-based screening for diabetes was carried out by project health workers using a diabetes risk score and capillary blood glucose test. Participants at high risk for diabetes were asked to undergo confirmatory tests. On follow-up visit, health workers assessed if the participant had undergone confirmation and ask for reasons if not so.

resultsOf the 35,475 eligible adults screened between April 2015 and August 2016, 10,960 (31%) were determined to be at high risk. Among those at high risk, 9670 (88%) were followed up, and of those, only 616 (6%) underwent confirmation. Of those who underwent confirmation, 'lack of symptoms of diabetes warranting visit to health facility' (52%) and 'being at high risk was not necessary enough to visit' (41%) were the most commonly reported reasons for non-confirmation. Inconvenient facility time (4.4%), no nearby facility (3.2%), un-affordability (2.2%) and long waiting time (1.6%) were the common health system-related factors that affected the uptake of the confirmatory test.

conclusionConfirmation of diabetes was abysmally low in the study population. Low uptake of the confirmatory test might be due to low 'risk perception'. The uptake can be increased by improving the population risk perception through individual and/or community-focused risk communication interventions.

Indexed as

Rural PopulationAdultDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleHumansIndiaMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedReferral and ConsultationRisk FactorsConfirmatory testdiabetes mellitusscreeningSORT ITUDAY

Identifiers

PMID29334333
PMCPMC5769807
OpenAlexW2783125810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.