Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29334045›Full record

ArticlePrimary health care research & development2018

Development of a patient experience questionnaire to improve lifestyle services in primary care.

Paula Brauer, Dawna Royall, Anneli Kaethler, Alexandra Mayhew, Maya Israeloff-Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Primary health care research & development, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Can Patients Co-Create Value in an Online Healthcare Platform? An Examination of Value Co-Creation.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Paula BrauerDepartment of Family Relations and Applied Nutrition,University of Guelph,Guelph,ONCanada.
Dawna RoyallDepartment of Family Relations and Applied Nutrition,University of Guelph,Guelph,ONCanada.
Anneli KaethlerDepartment of Family Relations and Applied Nutrition,University of Guelph,Guelph,ONCanada.
Alexandra MayhewDepartment of Family Relations and Applied Nutrition,University of Guelph,Guelph,ONCanada.
Maya Israeloff-SmithDepartment of Family Relations and Applied Nutrition,University of Guelph,Guelph,ONCanada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

AimWe developed a self-report tool to assess patients' experiences with lifestyle services in team-based primary care and pilot tested the questionnaire as part of a lifestyle intervention study to reverse metabolic syndrome.

backgroundOlder client satisfaction questionnaires have been generally inadequate for quality improvement purposes, as they have been focused mainly on interpersonal skills of providers and/or in the context of one disease. New approaches to assessing the patient experience of lifestyle programs in primary care are needed and could inform quality improvement efforts over time.

methodsThe first phase in developing the questionnaire involved a group-administered questionnaire distributed to 38 healthcare providers in five groups to prioritize variables to include in the survey. Concepts were taken from a previous review of available questionnaires assessing primary care services. The draft questionnaire was reviewed by 11 participants from a lifestyle program using think-aloud cognitive interviewing techniques. The modified self-administered questionnaire (paper and online versions) was then pilot tested with 164 recipients of a nutrition and physical activity intervention program.FindingsProviders ranked the top variables to include in the questionnaire as: 'trust,' 'general communication,' 'first-contact accessibility,' 'whole-person care,' and 'respectfulness.' After cognitive interviewing and revisions, 21 multiple choice and two open-ended questions were used for pilot testing. Pilot testing identified additional minor wording changes that were needed for clarity, a decreased number of questions for redundant concepts, and decreased options for ceiling effects, resulting in 20 multiple choice and one open-ended question.

conclusionsThe modified self-administered patient experience questionnaire to assess lifestyle services in primary care has undergone rigorous development. Further validation is needed. The assessment of patient experience of lifestyle programs can be used to supplement other data to assess the overall effectiveness of such programs.

Indexed as

AdultAgedFemaleHealthy LifestyleHumansMaleMetabolic SyndromeMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionPilot ProjectsPrimary Health CareQuality ImprovementSurveys and Questionnairesdiethealthcare teampatient experiencephysical activityprimary healthcarequestionnaire

Identifiers

PMID29334045
PMCPMC6693296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.