SynthesisHua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology2017
[Remineralization effect of casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate for enamel demineralization: a system review].
Synthesis in Hua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Expert consensus on the prevention and treatment of enamel demineralization in orthodontic treatment.International journal of oral science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aims to assess the remineralization effect of casein phosphopeptide (CPP)-amorphous calcium phosphate (ACP) on enamel demineralization by performing system review of randomized controlled trials (RCT) involving the treatment of enamel demineralization with CPP-ACP.
methodsThe study was developed based on the Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions (Version 5.1.0) and included the following: search strategy, selection criteria, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment. We searched electronic databases such as PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wanfang and VIP up to September 2016. RCT of treating enamel demineralization with CPP-ACP were included. Data extraction and domain-based risk of bias assessment were independently performed by two reviewers.
resultsTwelve RCTs were included. Because of the difference of experimental design and evaluation standards, the quantitative analysis can not be carried out.
conclusionsThere is no strong evidence that CPP-ACP is superior to conventional fluoride formulations in enamel remineralization. However, due to the limitations of sample size, follow-up time and study design, more high quality and large-sample RCT are needed to further verify the evidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.