ArticleJournal of microscopy2018
A guide to analysis and reconstruction of serial block face scanning electron microscopy data.
Article in Journal of microscopy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- A transmission electron microscopy platform for assessing mitochondrial and nuclear architecture in cardiomyocytes.Cell reports methods · 2025Article
- Advances in Imaging Techniques for Mammalian/Human Ciliated Cell's Cilia: Insights into Structure, Function, and Dynamics.Biology · 2025Review
- Layer-specific anatomical and physiological features of the retina's neurovascular unit.Current biology : CB · 2025Article
- Unraveling the ultrastructure and dynamics of autophagic vesicles: Insights from advanced imaging techniques.FASEB bioAdvances · 2024Review
- Unusual morphology of foveal Müller glia in an adult human born pre-term.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2024Article
- Correlative Imaging to Detect Rare HIV Reservoirs and Associated Damage in Tissues.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024Article
- Unusual nuclear structures in male meiocytes of wild-type rye as revealed by volume microscopy.Annals of botany · 2023Article
- Volumetric Reconstruction of a Human Retinal Pigment Epithelial Cell Reveals Specialized Membranes and Polarized Distribution of Organelles.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2023Article
- Investigation of heterocellular features of the mouse retinal neurovascular unit by 3D electron microscopy.Journal of anatomy · 2023Article
- Serial Block Face-Scanning Electron Microscopy as a Burgeoning Technology.Advanced biology · 2023Review
- Systematic Transmission Electron Microscopy-Based Identification and 3D Reconstruction of Cellular Degradation Machinery.Advanced biology · 2023Article
- Optical tissue clearing associated with 3D imaging: application in preclinical and clinical studies.Histochemistry and cell biology · 2022Review
- Article
- Resolving physical interactions between bacteria and nanotopographies with focused ion beam scanning electron microscopy.iScience · 2021Article
- Membrane imaging in the plant endomembrane system.Plant physiology · 2021Article
- Serial Block-Face Scanning Electron Microscopy (SBF-SEM) of Biological Tissue Samples.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2021Article
- Review
- Podocyte penetration of the glomerular basement membrane to contact on the mesangial cell at the lesion of mesangial interposition in lupus nephritis: a three-dimensional analysis by serial block-face scanning electron microscopy.Clinical and experimental nephrology · 2019Article
- Three-dimensional imaging and analysis of the internal structure of SAPO-34 zeolite crystals.RSC advances · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Serial block face scanning electron microscopy (SBF-SEM) is a relatively new technique that allows the acquisition of serially sectioned, imaged and digitally aligned ultrastructural data. There is a wealth of information that can be obtained from the resulting image stacks but this presents a new challenge for researchers - how to computationally analyse and make best use of the large datasets produced. One approach is to reconstruct structures and features of interest in 3D. However, the software programmes can appear overwhelming, time-consuming and not intuitive for those new to image analysis. There are a limited number of published articles that provide sufficient detail on how to do this type of reconstruction. Therefore, the aim of this paper is to provide a detailed step-by-step protocol, accompanied by tutorial videos, for several types of analysis programmes that can be used on raw SBF-SEM data, although there are more options available than can be covered here. To showcase the programmes, datasets of skeletal muscle from foetal and adult guinea pigs are initially used with procedures subsequently applied to guinea pig cardiac tissue and locust brain. The tissue is processed using the heavy metal protocol developed specifically for SBF-SEM. Trimmed resin blocks are placed into a Zeiss Sigma SEM incorporating the Gatan 3View and the resulting image stacks are analysed in three different programmes, Fiji, Amira and MIB, using a range of tools available for segmentation. The results from the image analysis comparison show that the analysis tools are often more suited to a particular type of structure. For example, larger structures, such as nuclei and cells, can be segmented using interpolation, which speeds up analysis; single contrast structures, such as the nucleolus, can be segmented using the contrast-based thresholding tools. Knowing the nature of the tissue and its specific structures (complexity, contrast, if there are distinct membranes, size) will help to determine the best method for reconstruction and thus maximize informative output from valuable tissue.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.