ArticleChild development2019
Children's Perceptions of Economic Groups in a Context of Limited Access to Opportunities.
Article in Child development, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Children's and adolescents' reasoning about distributive fairness and educational inequalities.International journal of behavioral development · 2026Article
- Developmental Perspectives on Social Inequalities and Human Rights.Human development · 2022Article
- Socioeconomic status biases among children and adolescents: The role of school diversity and teacher beliefs in Nepal.Child development · 2022Article
- Group Norms Influence Children's Expectations About Status Based on Wealth and Popularity.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Adolescents' own and parental expectations for cross-group friendship in the context of societal inequalities.The Journal of social issues · 2021Article
- Expectations for Cross-Ethnic Inclusion by Asian America Children and Adolescents.Group processes & intergroup relations : GPIR · 2020Article
- Children's and Adolescents' Evaluations of Intergroup Exclusion in Interracial and Interwealth Peer Contexts.Child development · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Children (N = 267, ages 8-14 years, M = 11.61 years, middle to upper-middle income) made predictions regarding groups of same-aged peers from high-wealth and low-wealth backgrounds. The context involved granting access to a special opportunity. From middle childhood to early adolescence children increasingly expected both high- and low-wealth groups to want access to opportunities for their own group. However, children viewed high-wealth groups as motivated in part by selfishness and low-wealth groups as concerned in part with broader economic inequality. Finally, the higher children's family income, the more they expected group-serving tendencies. These findings revealed children's perceptions of exclusive preferences between economic groups, negative stereotypes about high-wealth children, and awareness of some of the constraints faced by low-wealth children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.