Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29333461›Full record

ArticleAsia Oceania journal of nuclear medicine & biology2018

Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy for Coronary Artery Disease: Relationship of Symptom Amelioration and Ischemia Improvement.

Youko Takakuwa, Masayoshi Sarai, Hideki Kawai, Akira Yamada, Kenji Shiino, Kayoko Takada, Yasuomi Nagahara, Meiko Miyagi, Sadako Motoyama, Hiroshi Toyama and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Asia Oceania journal of nuclear medicine & biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Youko TakakuwaDepartment of Cardiology, School of Medicine, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan.
Masayoshi SaraiDepartment of Cardiology, School of Medicine, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan.
Hideki KawaiDepartment of Cardiology, School of Medicine, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan.
Akira YamadaDepartment of Cardiology, School of Medicine, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan.
Kenji ShiinoDepartment of Cardiology, School of Medicine, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan.
Kayoko TakadaDepartment of Cardiology, School of Medicine, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan.
Yasuomi NagaharaDepartment of Cardiology, School of Medicine, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan.
Meiko MiyagiDepartment of Cardiology, School of Medicine, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan.
Sadako MotoyamaDepartment of Cardiology, School of Medicine, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan.
Hiroshi ToyamaDepartment of Radiology, School of Medicine, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan.
Yukio OzakiDepartment of Cardiology, School of Medicine, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan.
Fujita Health University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe current management of coronary artery disease (CAD) relies on three major therapeutic options, namely medication, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). However, severe CAD that is not indicated for PCI or CABG still bears a poor prognosis due to the lack of effective treatments. In 2006, extracorporeal cardiac shock wave (SW) therapy reported on human for the first time. This treatment resulted in better myocardial perfusion as evaluated by dipyridamole stress thallium scintigraphy, angina symptoms, and exercise tolerance. The aim of the present study was to investigate: myocardial perfusion images and evaluate the relationship between the ischemia improvement and symptom amelioration by SW therapy.

methodsWe treated ten patients (i.e., nine males and one female) with cardiac SW therapy who had CAD but not indicated for PCI or CABG and aged 63-89 years old. After the SW therapy, all patients were followed up for three months to evaluate any amelioration of the myocardial ischemia based on symptoms, adenosine stress thallium scintigraphy, transthoracic echocardiography, and blood biochemical examinations.

resultsThe changes in various parameters were evaluated before and after cardiac SW therapy. The cardiac SW therapy resulted in a significant improvement in the symptoms as evaluated by the Canadian Cardiovascular Society [CCS] class score (P=0.016) and a tendency to improve in summed stress score (SSS) (P=0.068). However, no significant improvement was observed in the summed rest score (SRS), summed difference score (SDS), left ventricular wall motion score index (LVWMSI), N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic, and troponin I. The difference of CCS class score (ΔCCS) was significantly correlated with those of SSS (ΔSSS) and SDS (ΔSDS) (r=0.69, P=0.028 and r=0.70, P=0.025, respectively). There was no significant correlation between ΔCCS and other parameters. Furthermore, no significant difference was observed between the CCS improved and non-improved groups in terms of the baseline characteristics.

conclusionThe current study demonstrated the potential efficacy and safety of Cardiac SW therapy in CAD patients. As the findings indicated, symptom amelioration was associated with ischemia improvement by extracorporeal shock wave therapy for the CAD patients.

Indexed as

Coronary artery diseaseMyocardial perfusion imageShock wave therapy

Identifiers

PMID29333461
PMCPMC5765327
OpenAlexW2781787695

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.