Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29333271›Full record

ArticleBMJ open respiratory research2018

Childhood asthma prevalence: cross-sectional record linkage study comparing parent-reported wheeze with general practitioner-recorded asthma diagnoses from primary care electronic health records in Wales.

Lucy J Griffiths, Ronan A Lyons, Amrita Bandyopadhyay, Karen S Tingay, Suzanne Walton, Mario Cortina-Borja, Ashley Akbari, Helen Bedford, Carol Dezateux

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open respiratory research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Sex Differences in Lung Immunity.Immunological reviews · 2026
    Review
  3. Agreement between parent reported and clinical coding of asthma, eczema and allergic rhinitis: The multi-ethnic Born in Bradford cohort.Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Lucy J GriffithsLife Course Epidemiology and Biostatistics, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK.
Ronan A LyonsFarr Institute, Swansea University Medical School, Swansea, UK.
Amrita BandyopadhyayFarr Institute, Swansea University Medical School, Swansea, UK.
Karen S TingayFarr Institute, Swansea University Medical School, Swansea, UK.
Suzanne WaltonLife Course Epidemiology and Biostatistics, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK.
Mario Cortina-BorjaClinical Epidemiology, Nutrition and Biostatistics, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK.
Ashley AkbariFarr Institute, Swansea University Medical School, Swansea, UK.
Helen BedfordLife Course Epidemiology and Biostatistics, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK.
Carol DezateuxLife Course Epidemiology and Biostatistics, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9787-6276
Great Ormond Street Hospital · GBSwansea University · GBQueen Mary University of London · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_13043Medical Research Council MR/K006525/1Medical Research Council MR/K006584/1Medical Research Council MR/K023233/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionElectronic health records (EHRs) are increasingly used to estimate the prevalence of childhood asthma. The relation of these estimates to those obtained from parent-reported wheezing suggestive of asthma is unclear. We hypothesised that parent-reported wheezing would be more prevalent than general practitioner (GP)-recorded asthma diagnoses in preschool-aged children.

methods1529 of 1840 (83%) Millennium Cohort Study children registered with GPs in the Welsh Secure Anonymised Information Linkage databank were linked. Prevalences of parent-reported wheezing and GP-recorded asthma diagnoses in the previous 12 months were estimated, respectively, from parent report at ages 3, 5, 7 and 11 years, and from Read codes for asthma diagnoses and prescriptions based on GP EHRs over the same time period. Prevalences were weighted to account for clustered survey design and non-response. Cohen's kappa statistics were used to assess agreement.

resultsParent-reported wheezing was more prevalent than GP-recorded asthma diagnoses at 3 and 5 years. Both diminished with age: by age 11, prevalences of parent-reported wheezing and GP-recorded asthma diagnosis were 12.9% (95% CI 10.6 to 15.4) and 10.9% (8.8 to 13.3), respectively (difference: 2% (-0.5 to 4.5)). Other GP-recorded respiratory diagnoses accounted for 45.7% (95% CI 37.7 to 53.9) and 44.8% (33.9 to 56.2) of the excess in parent-reported wheezing at ages 3 and 5 years, respectively.

conclusionParent-reported wheezing is more prevalent than GP-recorded asthma diagnoses in the preschool years, and this difference diminishes in primary school-aged children. Further research is needed to evaluate the implications of these differences for the characterisation of longitudinal childhood asthma phenotypes from EHRs.

Indexed as

asthma epidemiologyasthma in primary carepaediatric asthma

Identifiers

PMID29333271
PMCPMC5759709
OpenAlexW2782749981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.