Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29333249›Full record

ArticleF1000Research2017

Health Technology Assessment capacity development in low- and middle-income countries: Experiences from the international units of HITAP and NICE.

Sripen Tantivess, Kalipso Chalkidou, Nattha Tritasavit, Yot Teerawattananon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in F1000Research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. A systematic assessment of the demand for HTA hub services in Asia.International journal of technology assessment in health care · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Health technology assessment capacity to support Zambia's health benefits package reform policy.International journal of technology assessment in health care · 2025
    Article
  20. Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sripen TantivessHealth Intervention and Technology Assessment Program (HITAP), Ministry of Public Health, Thailand, Muang, Nonthaburi, 11000, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2326-0422
Kalipso ChalkidouCenter for Global Development, London, SW1Y 4TE, UK.
Nattha TritasavitInternational Unit, Health Intervention and Technology Assessment Program (HITAP), Ministry of Public Health, Thailand, Muang, Nonthaburi, 11000, Thailand.
Yot TeerawattananonHealth Intervention and Technology Assessment Program (HITAP), Ministry of Public Health, Thailand, Muang, Nonthaburi, 11000, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Health Technology Assessment (HTA) is policy research that aims to inform priority setting and resource allocation. HTA is increasingly recognized as a useful policy tool in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where there is a substantial need for evidence to guide Universal Health Coverage policies, such as benefit coverage, quality improvement interventions and quality standards, all of which aim at improving the efficiency and equity of the healthcare system. The Health Intervention and Technology Assessment Program (HITAP), Thailand, and the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), UK, are national HTA organizations providing technical support to governments in LMICs to build up their priority setting capacity. This paper draws lessons from their capacity building programs in India, Colombia, Myanmar, the Philippines, and Vietnam. Such experiences suggest that it is not only technical capacity, for example analytical techniques for conducting economic evaluation, but also management, coordination and communication capacity that support the generation and use of HTA evidence in the respective settings. The learned lessons may help guide the development of HTA capacity in other LMICs.

Indexed as

capacity buildinghealth policyhealth technology assessmentlow- and middle-income countriespriority setting

Identifiers

PMID29333249
PMCPMC5749126

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.