ArticleExpert review of ophthalmology2017
Systematic Review of Community-Engaged Research in Ophthalmology.
Article in Expert review of ophthalmology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Understanding Patient Experience With Past Barriers to Eye Care and How Barriers Were Addressed in the Michigan Screening and Intervention for Glaucoma and Eye Health through Telemedicine Program.American journal of ophthalmology · 2025Trial
- Design of a Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial for Comparing the Michigan Screening and Intervention for Glaucoma and Eye Health and Telemedicine Protocol with Usual Care for Disease Detection.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
- Barriers and Facilitators of Implementing a Community and Faith-Based Intervention to Increase Eye Care Utilization in Black Americans.American journal of ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Patients' Perspectives on Social Barriers to Care and the Acceptability and Impact of a Community Health Worker Program in Outpatient Ophthalmology.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2025Article
- Experiences of older adult Filipino-Americans surrounding eye surgery and factors in health decision-making: a qualitative study.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Engaging communities: A scoping literature review of community-based participatory research in genetics service delivery settings.Journal of community genetics · 2024Article
- Implications of Neighborhood- and Patient-Level Factors for Eye Care.JAMA ophthalmology · 2024Article
- Social Determinants of Health and Glaucoma Screening and Detection in the SIGHT Studies.Journal of glaucoma · 2024Article
- Spatial Vision Inequalities: A Literature Review of the Impact of Place on Vision and Eye Health Outcomes.Translational vision science & technology · 2024Review
- The intersection of community engagement and team science research: A scoping review.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2024Article
- Social Deprivation and the Risk of Screening Positive for Glaucoma in the MI-SIGHT Telemedicine-Based Glaucoma Detection Program.Ophthalmology · 2023Article
- Integrated people-centered eye care: A scoping review on engaging communities in eye care in low- and middle-income settings.PloS one · 2023Article
- Considerations for Using Large Data Sets to Assess Disparities in Eye Care and Vision Health.JAMA ophthalmology · 2022Article
- Data Sources for Evaluating Health Disparities in Ophthalmology: Where We Are and Where We Need to Go.Ophthalmology · 2022Article
- Addressing Social Determinants of Vision Health.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2022Review
- A review of reviews on principles, strategies, outcomes and impacts of research partnerships approaches: a first step in synthesising the research partnership literature.Health research policy and systems · 2020Review
- Partnerships, Processes, and Outcomes: A Health Equity-Focused Scoping Meta-Review of Community-Engaged Scholarship.Annual review of public health · 2020Article
- Best Practices for Community-Engaged Research with Pacific Islander Communities in the US and USAPI: A Scoping Review.Journal of health care for the poor and underserved · 2019Article
- Evaluating the impact of a network of research partnerships: a longitudinal multiple case study protocol.Health research policy and systems · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionCommunity-engaged research (CEnR) allows researchers and community organizations to partner together to improve health outcomes and to decrease health disparities. While prevalent in other fields of medicine, it is rarely used in ophthalmology. AREAS COVERED: A comprehensive search of Ovid MEDLINE, NLM Pubmed, Ovid Embase, Scopus and the Cochrane Library for the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) "Community-based participatory research" and text word variations including EXPERT COMMENTARY: Ophthalmology is perfectly positioned to benefit from CEnR. Increased community engagement in ophthalmic research would expand the reach of our work and address some of the most difficult problems in vision disparities and outcomes.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.