Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29333184›Full record

ReviewEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM2017

Meta-Analysis of Chinese Traditional Medicine Bushen Huoxue Prescription for Endometriosis Treatment.

Jing Shan, Wen Cheng, Dong-Xia Zhai, Dan-Ying Zhang, Rui-Pin Yao, Ling-Ling Bai, Zai-Long Cai, Yu-Huan Liu, Chao-Qin Yu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Bushen Wenyang Huayu Decoction Targets TLR4/NF-Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2022
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Anti-endometriosis Mechanism ofFrontiers in pharmacology · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jing ShanShanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4499-2975
Wen ChengDepartment of Gynecology of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Dong-Xia ZhaiDepartment of Gynecology of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Dan-Ying ZhangDepartment of Gynecology of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Rui-Pin YaoDepartment of Gynecology of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Ling-Ling BaiDepartment of Gynecology of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Zai-Long CaiDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Yu-Huan LiuDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3810-6364
Chao-Qin YuDepartment of Gynecology of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1614-2655

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of Bushen Huoxue prescription (BSHXP) for endometriosis.

methodsA meta-analysis was performed, and studies were searched from the seven databases from the date of database establishment to April 30, 2017. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that explored the efficacy and safety of BSHXP for patients with endometriosis were included. Two assessors independently reviewed each trial. The Cochrane Risk of Bias assessment tool was used for quality assessment.

resultsIn the 13 included studies, the total effectiveness rates of BSHXP were higher than those of Western medicine (RR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.03-2.32;

conclusionsOur study provides evidence that BSHXP is effective and safe for endometriosis, but this evidence is inconclusive because of the low methodological quality of the included RCTs. Our findings suggest that BSHXP is an alternative drug for endometriosis, but it should be further examined in future clinical research.

Identifiers

PMID29333184
PMCPMC5733233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.