Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29332979›Full record

ArticleChemometrics and intelligent laboratory systems : an international journal sponsored by the Chemometrics Society2017

Standardized maximim

Ping-Yang Chen, Ray-Bing Chen, Heng-Chin Tung, Weng Kee Wong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chemometrics and intelligent laboratory systems : an international journal sponsored by the Chemometrics Society, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Metaheuristics for pharmacometrics.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2021
    Review
  6. Soft computing · 2021
    Article
  7. Using Differential Evolution to Design Optimal Experiments.Chemometrics and intelligent laboratory systems : an international journal sponsored by the Chemometrics Society · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ping-Yang ChenDepartment of Statistics, National Cheng-Kung University, Tainan, 70101, Taiwan.
Ray-Bing ChenDepartment of Statistics, National Cheng-Kung University, Tainan, 70101, Taiwan.
Heng-Chin TungDepartment of Statistics, National Cheng-Kung University, Tainan, 70101, Taiwan.
Weng Kee WongDepartment of Biostatistics, Fielding School of Public Health, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1772, USA.

Funding

Designing Efficient Designs under Model Uncertainty for Biological StudiesR01GM107639 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI WONG, WENG K · 2014 to 2017
$1.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM107639
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Locally optimal designs for nonlinear models require a single set of nominal values for the unknown parameters. An alternative is the maximin approach that allows the user to specify a range of values for each parameter of interest. However, the maximin approach is difficult because we first have to determine the locally optimal design for each set of nominal values before maximin types of optimal designs can be found via a nested optimization process. We show that particle swarm optimization (PSO) techniques can solve such complex optimization problems effectively. We demonstrate numerical results from PSO can help find, for the first time, formulae for standardized maximin

Indexed as

Approximate designLocally D-optimal designNonlinear modelParticle swarm optimization

Identifiers

PMID29332979
PMCPMC5761082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.